» Articles » PMID: 21804830

Induction of Specific Immunotherapy with Hymenoptera Venoms Using Ultrarush Regimen in Children: Safety and Tolerance

Overview
Date 2011 Aug 2
PMID 21804830
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Objective. Ultrarush induction for specific venom immunotherapy has been shown to be reliable and efficacious in adults. In this study its safety and tolerance in children was evaluated. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 102 ultrarush desensitizations carried out between 1997 and 2005 in 94 children, aged 4 to 15 years. Diagnosis and selection for immunotherapy were according to recommendations of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Systemic adverse reactions (SARs) were described using the classification of H. L. Mueller. Results. All patients reached the cumulative dose of 111.1 μg hymenoptera venom within 210 minutes. Six patients (6%) had allergic reactions grade I; 2 patients (2%) grade II and 5 patients (5%) grade III. Three patients (3%) showed unclassified reactions. SARs did not occur in the 15 patients aged 4 to 8 years and they were significantly more frequent in girls (29%) compared with boys (12%) (P = 0.034, multivariant analysis) and in bee venom extract treated patients (20%) compared to those treated with wasp venom extract (8%) (OR 0.33, 95% Cl 0.07-1.25). Conclusion. Initiation of specific immunotherapy by ultrarush regimen is safe and well tolerated in children and should be considered for treating children with allergy to hymenoptera venom.

Citing Articles

Venom immunotherapy protocols in the pediatric population: how to choose?.

Saretta F, Giovannini M, Pessina B, Barni S, Liccioli G, Sarti L Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1192081.

PMID: 37744438 PMC: 10512975. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1192081.


Bioactive Peptides and Proteins from Wasp Venoms.

Luo L, Kamau P, Lai R Biomolecules. 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35454116 PMC: 9025469. DOI: 10.3390/biom12040527.


Wasp Venom Biochemical Components and Their Potential in Biological Applications and Nanotechnological Interventions.

Abd El-Wahed A, Yosri N, Sakr H, Du M, Algethami A, Zhao C Toxins (Basel). 2021; 13(3).

PMID: 33809401 PMC: 8000949. DOI: 10.3390/toxins13030206.


Anaphylaxis to drugs: Overcoming mast cell unresponsiveness by fake antigens.

Pichler W Allergy. 2020; 76(5):1340-1349.

PMID: 32780486 PMC: 8247404. DOI: 10.1111/all.14554.


EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy User's Guide.

Alvaro-Lozano M, Akdis C, Akdis M, Alviani C, Angier E, Arasi S Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020; 31 Suppl 25:1-101.

PMID: 32436290 PMC: 7317851. DOI: 10.1111/pai.13189.


References
1.
Ross R, Nelson H, Finegold I . Effectiveness of specific immunotherapy in the treatment of hymenoptera venom hypersensitivity: a meta-analysis. Clin Ther. 2000; 22(3):351-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)80039-9. View

2.
Reimers A, Hari Y, Muller U . Reduction of side-effects from ultrarush immunotherapy with honeybee venom by pretreatment with fexofenadine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Allergy. 2000; 55(5):484-8. DOI: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00520.x. View

3.
Bonifazi F, Jutel M, Bilo B, Birnbaum J, Muller U . Prevention and treatment of hymenoptera venom allergy: guidelines for clinical practice. Allergy. 2005; 60(12):1459-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00960.x. View

4.
Brehler R, Wolf H, Kutting B, Schnitker J, Luger T . Safety of a two-day ultrarush insect venom immunotherapy protocol in comparison with protocols of longer duration and involving a larger number of injections. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000; 105(6 Pt 1):1231-5. DOI: 10.1067/mai.2000.105708. View

5.
Birnbaum J, Charpin D, Vervloet D . Rapid Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: comparative safety of three protocols. Clin Exp Allergy. 1993; 23(3):226-30. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1993.tb00886.x. View