» Articles » PMID: 21804410

Surgical Treatment with an Angular Stable Plate for Complex Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in Elderly Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal J Orthop Trauma
Date 2011 Aug 2
PMID 21804410
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate functional outcome, patient self-assessment, and radiographic outcome at 1 year in displaced three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures (OTA group 11-B2 and 11-C2).

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Academic medical center.

Patients/participants: Fifty patients aged 60 years or older with displaced three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures and no previous shoulder injuries were randomized either to surgical treatment or to conservative closed treatment. Twenty-five patients were included in each group. Forty-eight patients completed 12-month follow-up. Two surgical patients died within 3 months.

Intervention: The surgically treated group had a standardized surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation using an angular stable plate and cerclages. Instructed physical therapy started the third postoperative day. The conservative treatment group had a standardized nonoperative treatment that included closed reduction if displacement between the head and metaphyseal shaft fragment exceeded 50% of the diaphyseal diameter. Physical therapy started on the fifteenth postoperative day.

Main Outcome Measurements: The main outcome was the mean difference in Constant score between the injured and noninjured shoulder at 12 months. The secondary outcomes were patient self-assessment (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) and radiographic ratings at 12 months.

Results: At 12 months, mean Constant scores favored conservative treatment by 2.4 points (nonsignificant; P = 0.62). There was no significant difference in mean patient self-assessment. However, radiographic outcomes were significantly better for surgically treated patients.

Conclusion: There is no evidence of a difference in functional outcome at 1-year follow-up between surgical treatment and conservative treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

Citing Articles

Is surgical treatment better than non-surgical treatment for proximal humeral fracture in elderly people? A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Hernandes Junior P, Garcia T, de Oliveira Caravellos Gloria R, Waldolato G, de Andrade A, Labronici P Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025; 35(1):51.

PMID: 39775965 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04170-8.


How long is the arm immobilised after a conservatively managed displaced proximal humerus fracture and does early mobilisation effect complication rates: A systematic review.

Tunnicliffe H, Divall P, ONeill S, Singh H, Wright D Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241239011.

PMID: 39552671 PMC: 11562216. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241239011.


Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life after Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Comparison with Joint-Preserving Locking Plate Osteosynthesis in Aged Patients: A Retrospective Comparison Study.

Jaekel C, Oezel L, Leibnitz F, Wilms L, Windolf J, Gehrmann S Orthop Surg. 2024; 17(1):224-232.

PMID: 39529573 PMC: 11735364. DOI: 10.1111/os.14236.


Does primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures show favourable functional outcomes over secondary treatment with reverse shoulder arthroplasty?.

Blaas L, Lameijer C, Alta T, Yuan J, van Dieren S, Bloemers F Shoulder Elbow. 2024; 16(5):559-568.

PMID: 39493403 PMC: 11528779. DOI: 10.1177/17585732231190038.


Surgical management and results of glenohumeral combination fractures of the anterior glenoid rim and the proximal humerus.

Kerkhoff E, Ull C, Rausch V, Bernstorff M, Seybold D, Schildhauer T Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(11):4899-4906.

PMID: 39358485 PMC: 11582334. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05577-y.