» Articles » PMID: 21798891

Evaluation of C-reactive Protein Prior to and On-treatment As a Predictor of Benefit from Atorvastatin: Observations from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial

Overview
Journal Eur Heart J
Date 2011 Jul 30
PMID 21798891
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: We tested whether on-statin C-reactive protein is associated with cardiovascular (CV) outcome in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT).

Methods And Results: ASCOT randomized a subset of 4853 patients with total cholesterol ≤6.5 mmol/L (250 mg/dL) to atorvastatin or placebo. In a case-control study during 5.5-year follow-up, 485 CV cases were age- and sex-matched with 1367 controls. Baseline LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c) and log-transformed C-reactive protein predicted CV events [odds ratio (OR) per 1 standard deviation (SD) 1.31 (95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.10, 1.56), P = 0.002 and OR 1.19 (1.05, 1.34), P = 0.006, respectively]. Including baseline C-reactive protein into a Framingham risk model very modestly improved risk prediction. Baseline C-reactive protein did not indicate the magnitude of the atorvastatin effect on CV outcome (P = 0.54). At 6 months, atorvastatin reduced median LDL-c by 40.3% and median C-reactive protein by 27.4%. In those randomized to atorvastatin, lower on-treatment LDL-c at 6 months was associated with a significant reduction in subsequent CV events [OR 0.41 (0.22, 0.75), P = 0.004] comparing those above and below the median (2.1 mmol/L). In contrast, C-reactive protein below the median (1.83 mg/L) compared with C-reactive protein above the median was not associated with a significant reduction in CV events [OR 0.86 (0.49, 1.51), P = 0.60]. Consequently, addition of on-treatment C-reactive protein to LDL-c did not improve prediction of statin efficacy.

Conclusion: Among these hypertensive patients selected on the basis of traditional CV risk factors, C-reactive protein did not usefully improve the prediction of CV events and, critically, reduction in C-reactive protein associated with statin therapy was not a predictor of CV outcome alone or in combination with LDL-c.

Citing Articles

Inflammatory residual risk: An emerging target to reduce cardiovascular disease?.

Volpe M, Presta V Clin Cardiol. 2018; 41(4):437-439.

PMID: 29693720 PMC: 6489727. DOI: 10.1002/clc.22885.


Targeting inflammation to reduce cardiovascular disease risk: a realistic clinical prospect?.

Welsh P, Grassia G, Botha S, Sattar N, Maffia P Br J Pharmacol. 2017; 174(22):3898-3913.

PMID: 28409825 PMC: 5660005. DOI: 10.1111/bph.13818.


Preprocedural C-Reactive Protein Predicts Outcomes after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction a systematic meta-analysis.

Mincu R, Janosi R, Vinereanu D, Rassaf T, Totzeck M Sci Rep. 2017; 7:41530.

PMID: 28128312 PMC: 5270244. DOI: 10.1038/srep41530.


Applying metabolomics to cardiometabolic intervention studies and trials: past experiences and a roadmap for the future.

Rankin N, Preiss D, Welsh P, Sattar N Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 45(5):1351-1371.

PMID: 27789671 PMC: 5100629. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw271.


Genetic predisposition and induced pro-inflammatory/pro-oxidative status may play a role in increased atherothrombotic events in nilotinib treated chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Bocchia M, Galimberti S, Aprile L, Sicuranza A, Gozzini A, Santilli F Oncotarget. 2016; 7(44):72311-72321.

PMID: 27527867 PMC: 5342164. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11100.


References
1.
Emberson J, Bennett D, Link E, Parish S, Danesh J, Armitage J . C-reactive protein concentration and the vascular benefits of statin therapy: an analysis of 20,536 patients in the Heart Protection Study. Lancet. 2011; 377(9764):469-76. PMC: 3042687. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62174-5. View

2.
Morrow D, de Lemos J, Sabatine M, Wiviott S, Blazing M, Shui A . Clinical relevance of C-reactive protein during follow-up of patients with acute coronary syndromes in the Aggrastat-to-Zocor Trial. Circulation. 2006; 114(4):281-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628909. View

3.
Lewington S, Whitlock G, Clarke R, Sherliker P, Emberson J, Halsey J . Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55,000 vascular deaths. Lancet. 2007; 370(9602):1829-39. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61778-4. View

4.
Sever P, Poulter N, Dahlof B, Wedel H, Beevers G, Caulfield M . The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial lipid lowering arm: extended observations 2 years after trial closure. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29(4):499-508. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm583. View

5.
Ridker P, MacFadyen J, Libby P, Glynn R . Relation of baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level to cardiovascular outcomes with rosuvastatin in the Justification for Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER). Am J Cardiol. 2010; 106(2):204-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.018. View