» Articles » PMID: 21794121

The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Study: Developing Risk Models for Application to Ongoing Randomized Trials of Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Cryptogenic Stroke

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2011 Jul 29
PMID 21794121
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite the diffusion into practice of percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS), the benefits have not been demonstrated, and remain unclear. For any individual presenting with a PFO in the setting of CS, it is not clear whether the PFO is pathogenically-related to the index event or an incidental finding. Further, the overall rate of stroke recurrence is low in patients with CS and PFO. How patient-specific factors affect the likelihood that a discovered PFO is related to an index stroke or affect the risk of recurrence is not well understood. These probabilities are likely to be important determinants of the benefits of PFO closure in CS.

Design/methods: The goal of the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Study is to develop and test a set of predictive models that can identify those patients most likely to benefit from preventive treatments for PFO-related stroke recurrence, such as PFO closure. To do this, we will construct a database of patients with CS, both with and without PFO, by combining existing cohort studies. We will use this pooled database to identify patient characteristics associated with the presence (versus the absence) of a PFO, and to use this "PFO propensity" to estimate the patient-specific probability that a PFO was pathogenically related to the index stroke (Model #1). We will also develop, among patients with both a CS and a PFO, a predictive model to estimate patient-specific stroke recurrence risk based on clinical, radiographic and echocardiographic characteristics. (Model #2). We will then combine Models #1 and #2 into a composite index that can rank patients with CS and PFO by their conditional probability that their PFO was pathogenically related to the index stroke and the risk of stroke recurrence. Finally, we will apply this composite index to completed clinical trials (currently on-going) testing endovascular PFO closure against medical therapy, to stratify patients from low-expected-benefit to high-expected-benefit.

Citing Articles

Overview and Future Direction of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source from the Insights of CHALLENGE ESUS/CS Registry.

Kikuno M, Ueno Y J Atheroscler Thromb. 2024; 31(12):1641-1651.

PMID: 39343604 PMC: 11620840. DOI: 10.5551/jat.RV22026.


Does Atrial Septal Anatomy Still Matter in the Etiological Evaluation of Ischemic Stroke Beyond the Age of 60?.

Dusonchet A, Varenne O, Puscas T, Saadi M, Hagege A, Calvet D J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(4):e031684.

PMID: 38353217 PMC: 11010114. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031684.


Impact of sex in stroke in the young.

Schwarzwald A, Fischer U, Seiffge D, Beyeler M, Scutelnic A, Kaesmacher J PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0274722.

PMID: 37000788 PMC: 10065293. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274722.


Change in patent foramen ovale height is associated with cryptogenic stroke and the construction of a morphology-based scoring system.

Liu X, Zhang Y, Xie H, Zeng H, Sun J, Su L Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:1010947.

PMID: 36518683 PMC: 9742367. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1010947.


The Hype Surrounding Patent Foramen Ovale Closure and Cryptogenic Stroke: A Walk Through History.

Racharla L, Kher A, Patel Z, Maitz T, Kluck B Heart Int. 2022; 16(1):59-63.

PMID: 36275353 PMC: 9524620. DOI: 10.17925/HI.2022.16.1.59.


References
1.
Almekhlafi M, Wilton S, Rabi D, Ghali W, Lorenzetti D, Hill M . Recurrent cerebral ischemia in medically treated patent foramen ovale: a meta-analysis. Neurology. 2009; 73(2):89-97. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181aa2a19. View

2.
Kent D, Hayward R . Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification. JAMA. 2007; 298(10):1209-12. DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.10.1209. View

3.
Pencina M, DAgostino R . Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med. 2004; 23(13):2109-23. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1802. View

4.
Hastie T, Tibshirani R . Generalized additive models for medical research. Stat Methods Med Res. 1995; 4(3):187-96. DOI: 10.1177/096228029500400302. View

5.
Krasuski R, Hart S, Allen D, Qureshi A, Pettersson G, Houghtaling P . Prevalence and repair of intraoperatively diagnosed patent foramen ovale and association with perioperative outcomes and long-term survival. JAMA. 2009; 302(3):290-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1012. View