Differences in the Consumption Rates and Regulatory Barriers to the Accessibility of Strong Opioid Analgesics in Israel and St. Petersburg
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To compare trends in opioid consumption in Israel and St. Petersburg/Russia (morphine, oxycodone, pethidine, fentanyl, methadone, buprenorphine, trimeperidine, and papaveretum) over the period 2000-2008, and to describe the regulatory barriers to their accessibility as an exploratory variable for between-country differences.
Methods: Data were drawn from the databases maintained by the Israel Ministry of Health's Pharmaceutical Administration and the St. Petersburg Central Pharmaceutical Reserve. The data were converted into a defined daily dose (DDD)/1,000 inhabitants/day. Regulation was evaluated according to the WHO guidelines for the assessment of national opioid regulation.
Results: The opioid consumption rates in Israel were substantially higher than those in St. Petersburg. The excess in DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day was for fentanyl +0.287 in 2000 and +1.206 in 2008, for morphine +0.245 in 2000 and +0.122 in 2008, and for pethidine/trimeperidine +0.035 in 2000 and +0.007 in 2008. Oxycodone consumption increased in Israel from 0.31 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2000 to 0.46 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2008, whereas this analgesic is not available in St. Petersburg. Methadone and buprenorphine consumption rose in Israel, whereas these drugs are not available in Russia. Conversely, omnopon consumption decreased in St. Petersburg from 0.0206 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2000 to 0.00304 DDD/1,000 inhabitants/day in 2008, whereas the compound is not available in Israel. St. Petersburg differs from Israel with less opioid formulary availability and greater regulatory restrictions.
Conclusion: The results suggest that strong opioid analgesics consumption rates in St. Petersburg yield those in Israel, and that the between-countries differences in opioid formularies availability and legal and regulatory barriers to opioids accessibility are responsible for the consumption discrepancies.
Wu T, Hsu C, Sun W, Chen H, Lin C, Shao Y Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021; 16:100255.
PMID: 34590061 PMC: 8406032. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100255.
Analgesic Medicine Utilization in Older People in New Zealand from 2005 to 2013.
Nishtala P, Oh S, Kim D, Chun N, Kamis S, Kiu K Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2016; 2(2):177-185.
PMID: 27747769 PMC: 4883194. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-015-0026-5.
Tsui J, Cheng D, Coleman S, Lira M, Blokhina E, Bridden C Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014; 144:87-92.
PMID: 25220898 PMC: 4252482. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.08.013.
Changes in trends and pattern of strong opioid prescribing in primary care.
Zin C, Chen L, Knaggs R Eur J Pain. 2014; 18(9):1343-51.
PMID: 24756859 PMC: 4238849. DOI: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.496.x.
Pain is associated with heroin use over time in HIV-infected Russian drinkers.
Tsui J, Cheng D, Coleman S, Blokhina E, Bridden C, Krupitsky E Addiction. 2013; 108(10):1779-87.
PMID: 23773361 PMC: 4012755. DOI: 10.1111/add.12274.