» Articles » PMID: 21791583

Prevalence of Corneal Dystrophies in the United States: Estimates from Claims Data

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2011 Jul 28
PMID 21791583
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of corneal dystrophies.

Methods: Records of almost 8 million enrollees in a national managed-care network throughout the United States who had an eye care visit in 2001 to 2009 were searched for a recording of corneal dystrophy on a claim submitted by an ophthalmologist or optometrist from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2007.

Results: Unique individuals (n = 27,372) received two or more diagnoses of any type of corneal dystrophy, for an overall corneal dystrophy prevalence rate of 897 per million (10⁶) covered lives. Endothelial and anterior corneal dystrophies accounted for most of the reported dystrophies, and granular corneal dystrophy was the least common, being reported in 167 enrollees. Age, sex, and race variations among the various corneal dystrophies were observed. The mean age of those with macular corneal dystrophy (47.3 years) was 15 years younger than the age of those with endothelial dystrophy (62.9 years), and females were most highly represented (68.5%) among those with lattice corneal dystrophy. Hispanics and blacks were underrepresented relative to enrollees undergoing eye care for reasons other than corneal dystrophy. Keratoplasty was most frequently coded among those with lattice dystrophy.

Conclusions: Although caveats must be considered in using claims data to estimate prevalence in a population, these data provide an indication of corneal dystrophy's prevalence within insured subjects across the United States. Variations in age, sex, and race, within and between the different types of corneal dystrophies, raise questions that warrant further study.

Citing Articles

Trehalose extricates impaired mitochondrial and autophagy dysregulation in patient iPSC-derived macular corneal dystrophy disease model.

Nayak D, Shivakumar S, Shetty R, Prashanthi K, Ghosh A, Jeyabalan N Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024; 15(1):464.

PMID: 39639354 PMC: 11622490. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-024-04016-4.


Prevalence of Certain Corneal Conditions and their Demographic Risk Factors; Tehran Geriatric Eye Study.

Hashemi A, Hashemi H, Aghamirsalim M, Jamali A, Khabazkhoob M Arch Iran Med. 2024; 27(8):414-420.

PMID: 39306712 PMC: 11416701. DOI: 10.34172/aim.28831.


Methylation in cornea and corneal diseases: a systematic review.

Xia Y, Chen K, Yang Q, Chen Z, Jin L, Zhang L Cell Death Discov. 2024; 10(1):169.

PMID: 38589350 PMC: 11002037. DOI: 10.1038/s41420-024-01935-2.


Visual outcomes and recurrence rate of macular corneal dystrophy following phototherapeutic keratectomy in Saudi Arabia.

AlHilali S, Jomar D, Albalawi E Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2023; 37(4):337-341.

PMID: 38155672 PMC: 10752283. DOI: 10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_194_22.


Microbial keratitis in lattice corneal dystrophy: microsporidia as a new cause.

Dutta A, Das S, Priyadarshini S, Mishra D BMJ Case Rep. 2023; 16(12).

PMID: 38114293 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-255143.


References
1.
Weiss J, Moller H, Lisch W, Kinoshita S, Aldave A, Belin M . The IC3D classification of the corneal dystrophies. Cornea. 2009; 27 Suppl 2:S1-83. PMC: 2866169. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31817780fb. View

2.
Lorenzetti D, UOTILA M, Parikh N, Kaufman H . Central cornea guttata. Incidence in the general population. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967; 64(6):1155-8. View

3.
Jonasson F, Oshima E, Thonar E, Smith C, Johannsson J, Klintworth G . Macular corneal dystrophy in Iceland. A clinical, genealogic, and immunohistochemical study of 28 patients. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103(7):1111-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30559-9. View

4.
Baratz K, Tosakulwong N, Ryu E, Brown W, Branham K, Chen W . E2-2 protein and Fuchs's corneal dystrophy. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(11):1016-24. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007064. View

5.
Zoega G, Fujisawa A, Sasaki H, Kubota A, Sasaki K, Kitagawa K . Prevalence and risk factors for cornea guttata in the Reykjavik Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113(4):565-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.014. View