Community Assembly: Alternative Stable States or Alternative Transient States?

Overview

Journal Ecol Lett

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2011 Jul 28

PMID 21790934

Citations 67

Authors

Tadashi Fukami

Mifuyu Nakajima

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The concept of alternative stable states has long been a dominant framework for studying the influence of historical contingency in community assembly. This concept focuses on stable states, yet many real communities are kept in a transient state by disturbance, and the utility of predictions for stable states in explaining transient states remains unclear. Using a simple model of plant community assembly, we show that the conditions under which historical contingency affects community assembly can differ greatly for stable versus transient states. Differences arise because the contribution of such factors as mortality rate, environmental heterogeneity and plant-soil feedback to historical contingency changes as community assembly proceeds. We also show that transient states can last for a long time relative to immigration rate and generation time. These results argue for a conceptual shift of focus from alternative stable states to alternative transient states for understanding historical contingency in community assembly.

Citing Articles

Quantifying stability and resilience of eco-social keystone species complexes for coastal marine ecosystems of the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific: applications in conservation and monitoring programmes.

Ortiz M, Hermosillo-Nunez B Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1909):20230176.

PMID: 39034701 PMC: 11293858. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0176.

Synthesis of recovery patterns in microbial communities across environments.

Jurburg S, Blowes S, Shade A, Eisenhauer N, Chase J Microbiome. 2024; 12(1):79.

PMID: 38711157 PMC: 11071242. DOI: 10.1186/s40168-024-01802-3.

Deterministic and stochastic processes generating alternative states of microbiomes.

Hayashi I, Fujita H, Toju H ISME Commun. 2024; 4(1):ycae007.

PMID: 38415200 PMC: 10897905. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycae007.

Competition for shared resources increases dependence on initial population size during coalescence of gut microbial communities.

Goldman D, Xue K, Parrott A, Jeeda R, Franzese L, Lopez J bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38076867 PMC: 10705444. DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.29.569120.

Prolonged delays in human microbiota transmission after a controlled antibiotic perturbation.

Xue K, Walton S, Goldman D, Morrison M, Verster A, Parrott A bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37808827 PMC: 10557656. DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.26.559480.

References

Chase J . Community assembly: when should history matter?. Oecologia. 2003; 136(4):489-98. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1311-7. View

Fukami T, Dickie I, Wilkie J, Paulus B, Park D, Roberts A . Assembly history dictates ecosystem functioning: evidence from wood decomposer communities. Ecol Lett. 2010; 13(6):675-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01465.x. View

Collinge S, Ray C . Transient patterns in the assembly of vernal pool plant communities. Ecology. 2010; 90(12):3313-23. DOI: 10.1890/08-2155.1. View

Jost L . Independence of alpha and beta diversities. Ecology. 2010; 91(7):1969-74. DOI: 10.1890/09-0368.1. View

Levine J, Pachepsky E, Kendall B, Yelenik S, Lambers J . Plant-soil feedbacks and invasive spread. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9(9):1005-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00949.x. View

Schoener T . Alternatives to Lotka-Volterra competition: models of intermediate complexity. Theor Popul Biol. 1976; 10(3):309-33. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90022-8. View

Chase J . Stochastic community assembly causes higher biodiversity in more productive environments. Science. 2010; 328(5984):1388-91. DOI: 10.1126/science.1187820. View

Fukami T, Beaumont H, Zhang X, Rainey P . Immigration history controls diversification in experimental adaptive radiation. Nature. 2007; 446(7134):436-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature05629. View

Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley J, Folke C, Walker B . Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature. 2001; 413(6856):591-6. DOI: 10.1038/35098000. View

10.

Jiang L, Patel S . Community assembly in the presence of disturbance: a microcosm experiment. Ecology. 2008; 89(7):1931-40. DOI: 10.1890/07-1263.1. View

11.

Shurin J, Amarasekare P, Chase J, Holt R, Hoopes M, Leibold M . Alternative stable states and regional community structure. J Theor Biol. 2004; 227(3):359-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.11.013. View

12.

Gilpin M, Case T . Multiple domains of attraction in competition communities. Nature. 1976; 261(5555):40-2. DOI: 10.1038/261040a0. View

13.

Crist T, Veech J, Gering J, Summerville K . Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of alpha, beta, and gamma diversity. Am Nat. 2004; 162(6):734-43. DOI: 10.1086/378901. View

14.

Lewontin R . The meaning of stability. Brookhaven Symp Biol. 1969; 22:13-24. View

15.

Hastings A . The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture. Timescales, dynamics, and ecological understanding. Ecology. 2011; 91(12):3471-80. DOI: 10.1890/10-0776.1. View

16.

Bever J . Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests. New Phytol. 2021; 157(3):465-473. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00714.x. View

17.

van Nes E, Scheffer M . Slow recovery from perturbations as a generic indicator of a nearby catastrophic shift. Am Nat. 2007; 169(6):738-47. DOI: 10.1086/516845. View

18.

Hastings A . Transients: the key to long-term ecological understanding?. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006; 19(1):39-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.007. View

19.

Kardol P, Wardle D . How understanding aboveground-belowground linkages can assist restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010; 25(11):670-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.001. View

20.

Bell G . Neutral macroecology. Science. 2001; 293(5539):2413-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.293.5539.2413. View