» Articles » PMID: 2178850

Clinical Significance of Pharmacokinetic Models of Hepatic Elimination

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1990 Jan 1
PMID 2178850
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Various pharmacokinetic models, both simple and complex, have been developed to describe the way in which the rate of hepatic elimination of drugs depends on hepatic blood flow, hepatic intrinsic clearance and unbound fraction of drug in blood. A model is necessary because it is not possible to measure the average blood concentration of drug within the liver, i.e. the concentration at the site of drug elimination. However, the predictions of these models can differ markedly for drugs of high hepatic clearance, especially with the oral route of administration. Investigations of the models have mostly involved studies with in vitro experimental preparations, such as isolated perfused livers. While such studies have advanced our understanding of the mechanism of hepatic uptake and elimination processes, the implications for clinical drug usage have been somewhat neglected. Use of one of the available models is necessary for the assessment of the capacity of in vivo hepatic drug metabolism processes (i.e. hepatic intrinsic clearance) and for predicting the effect of increasing dose on blood concentrations of high clearance drugs exhibiting Michaelis-Menten elimination kinetics, especially those that undergo a nonlinear hepatic first-pass effect. Clinically significant differences between the models can occur under these circumstances. A model is also required for quantitative prediction of the effect on blood drug concentrations of changes in hepatic blood flow, hepatic intrinsic clearance or drug-protein binding in blood. It is in predicting these changes that differences of major clinical significance can occur between the models. The greatest differences are seen in predicting the effect for orally administered drugs of changes of hepatic blood flow on blood concentrations, and changes of protein binding on unbound blood concentrations of drug. These changes can result from disease processes, altered physiology (old age or pregnancy), food intake or concomitant administration of other drugs. A model is also required for determining the mechanism by which such clinical changes occur. When considering these effects on hepatic elimination, it is essential to appreciate that the conclusions may depend markedly on the particular model chosen. Until more data on the applicability of the models are obtained in humans, the undistributed sinusoidal and venous equilibrium models, which represent the opposite extremes of behaviour among the available models, should both be used in assessing hepatic drug elimination.

Citing Articles

Advancements and challenges in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic research on the traditional Chinese medicine saponins: a comprehensive review.

Ma Y, Zhao Y, Luo M, Jiang Q, Liu S, Jia Q Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1393409.

PMID: 38774213 PMC: 11106373. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1393409.


Pharmacokinetic of antiepileptic drugs in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

Anderson G, Hakimian S Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013; 53(1):29-49.

PMID: 24122696 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-013-0107-0.


Effect of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of antihypertensive drugs.

Anderson G, Carr D Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009; 48(3):159-68.

PMID: 19385709 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200948030-00002.


Pregnancy-induced changes in pharmacokinetics: a mechanistic-based approach.

Anderson G Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005; 44(10):989-1008.

PMID: 16176115 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200544100-00001.


Optimal experimental design for precise estimation of the parameters of the axial dispersion model of hepatic elimination.

Chou C, Aarons L, Rowland M J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1999; 26(5):595-615.

PMID: 10205773 DOI: 10.1023/a:1023229318017.


References
1.
Byrne A, McNeil J, Harrison P, Louis W, Tonkin A, McLean A . Stable oral availability of sustained release propranolol when co-administered with hydralazine or food: evidence implicating substrate delivery rate as a determinant of presystemic drug interactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984; 17 Suppl 1:45S-50S. PMC: 1463259. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02427.x. View

2.
Mcainsh J, Baber N, Smith R, Young J . Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies with long-acting propranolol. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978; 6(2):115-21. PMC: 1429409. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1978.tb00835.x. View

3.
Melander A, Danielson K, SCHERSTEN B, Wahlin E . Enhancement of the bioavailability of propranolol and metoprolol by food. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1977; 22(1):108-12. DOI: 10.1002/cpt1977221108. View

4.
Wagner J . Predictability of verapamil steady-state plasma levels from single-dose data explained. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984; 36(1):1-4. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1984.129. View

5.
Wagner J, Szpunar G, FERRY J . A nonlinear physiologic pharmacokinetic model: I. Steady-state. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1985; 13(1):73-92. DOI: 10.1007/BF01073657. View