» Articles » PMID: 21787954

Genomic and Pedigree-based Genetic Parameters for Scarcely Recorded Traits when Some Animals Are Genotyped

Overview
Journal J Dairy Sci
Date 2011 Jul 27
PMID 21787954
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genetic parameters were estimated using relationships between animals that were based either on pedigree, 43,011 single nucleotide polymorphisms, or a combination of these, considering genotyped and non-genotyped animals. The standard error of the estimates and a parametric bootstrapping procedure was used to investigate sampling properties of the estimated variance components. The data set contained milk yield, dry matter intake and body weight for 517 first-lactation heifers with genotypes and phenotypes, and another 112 heifers with phenotypes only. Multivariate models were fitted using the different relationships in ASReml software. Estimates of genetic variance were lower based on genomic relationships than using pedigree relationships. Genetic variances from genomic and pedigree relationships were, however, not directly comparable because they apply to different base populations. Standard errors indicated that using the genomic relationships gave more accurate estimates of heritability but equally accurate estimates of genetic correlation. However, the estimates of standard errors were affected by the differences in scale between the 2 relationship matrices, causing differences in values of the genetic parameters. The bootstrapping results (with genetic parameters at the same level), confirmed that both heritability and genetic correlations were estimated more accurately with genomic relationships in comparison with using the pedigree relationships. Animals without genotype were included in the analysis by merging genomic and pedigree relationships. This allowed all phenotypes to be used, including those from non-genotyped animals. This combination of genomic and pedigree relationships gave the most accurate estimates of genetic variance. When a small data set is available it might be more advantageous for the estimation of genetic parameters to genotype existing animals, rather than collecting more phenotypes.

Citing Articles

Temporal dynamics of genetic parameters and SNP effects for performance and disorder traits in poultry undergoing genomic selection.

Richter J, Hidalgo J, Bussiman F, Breen V, Misztal I, Lourenco D J Anim Sci. 2024; 102.

PMID: 38576313 PMC: 11044709. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae097.


Genomic evaluation for breeding and genetic management in Cordia africana, a multipurpose tropical tree species.

Ousmael K, Cappa E, Hansen J, Hendre P, Hansen O BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):9.

PMID: 38166623 PMC: 10759591. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09907-z.


Comparison on genomic prediction using pedigree BLUP and single step GBLUP through the Hanwoo full-sib family.

Kim E, Kang H, Myung C, Kim J, Sun D, Lee D Anim Biosci. 2023; 36(9):1327-1335.

PMID: 37170517 PMC: 10472147. DOI: 10.5713/ab.22.0327.


Genomic heritability and correlation between carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle evaluated under different ceilings of relatedness among individuals.

Rostamzadeh Mahdabi E, Tian R, Li Y, Wang X, Zhao M, Li H Front Genet. 2023; 14:1053291.

PMID: 36816045 PMC: 9928846. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1053291.


Factor Analysis of Genetic Parameters for Body Conformation Traits in Dual-Purpose Simmental Cattle.

Xu L, Luo H, Zhang X, Lu H, Zhang M, Ge J Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(18).

PMID: 36139293 PMC: 9495085. DOI: 10.3390/ani12182433.