» Articles » PMID: 21785980

From Single Biobanks to International Networks: Developing E-governance

Overview
Journal Hum Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2011 Jul 26
PMID 21785980
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The future holds the possibility to link and network biobanks, existing biorepositories and reference databases for research purposes in ways that have not been possible before. There is the potential to develop 'research portals' that will enable researchers to access these research resources that are located around the globe with the click of a mouse. In this paper, I will argue that our current governance system for research is unable to provide all of the oversight and accountability mechanisms that are required for this new way of doing research that is based upon flows of data across international borders. For example, our current governance framework for research is nationally based, with a complex system of laws, policies and practice that can be unique to a jurisdiction. It is also evident that many of the nationally based governance bodies in this field do not have the legal powers or expertise to adjudicate on the complex issues, such as privacy and disclosure risks that are raised by cross-border data sharing. In addition, the conceptual underpinning of this research governance structure is based on the "one researcher, one project, one jurisdiction" model. In the conclusion of this paper, I lay out some preliminary ideas as to how this system has to change to accommodate research that is based on networks. I suggest that a move to digital governance mechanisms might be a start to making research governance systems more appropriate for the 21st century.

Citing Articles

Risk mapping for better governance in biobanking: the case of biobank.cy.

Akyuz K, Goisauf M, Martin G, Mayrhofer M, Antoniou S, Charalambidou G Front Genet. 2024; 15:1397156.

PMID: 38948356 PMC: 11211562. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1397156.


Developing Policy for the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative: Going from National to International.

Patrinos D, Kleiderman E, Fraser W, Zawati M Biopreserv Biobank. 2023; 21(3):267-274.

PMID: 37192471 PMC: 10282825. DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0198.


Towards trust-based governance of health data research.

Bak M, Ploem M, Tan H, Blom M, Willems D Med Health Care Philos. 2023; 26(2):185-200.

PMID: 36633724 PMC: 9835739. DOI: 10.1007/s11019-022-10134-8.


Looking back: three key lessons from 20 years of shaping Japanese genome research regulations.

Minari J, Yokono M, Takashima K, Kokado M, Ida R, Hishiyama Y J Hum Genet. 2021; 66(11):1039-1041.

PMID: 33972679 PMC: 8542510. DOI: 10.1038/s10038-021-00923-z.


The reconfiguration of biobanks in Europe under the BBMRI-ERIC framework: towards global sharing nodes?.

Argudo-Portal V, Domenech M Life Sci Soc Policy. 2020; 16(1):9.

PMID: 33000342 PMC: 7528224. DOI: 10.1186/s40504-020-00105-3.


References
1.
Zika E, Schulte In den Baumen T, Kaye J, Brand A, Ibarreta D . Sample, data use and protection in biobanking in Europe: legal issues. Pharmacogenomics. 2008; 9(6):773-81. DOI: 10.2217/14622416.9.6.773. View

2.
Wolfson M, Wallace S, Masca N, Rowe G, Sheehan N, Ferretti V . DataSHIELD: resolving a conflict in contemporary bioscience--performing a pooled analysis of individual-level data without sharing the data. Int J Epidemiol. 2010; 39(5):1372-82. PMC: 2972441. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq111. View

3.
. Dealing with data. Challenges and opportunities. Introduction. Science. 2011; 331(6018):692-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.331.6018.692. View

4.
Gostin L, Hodge J . Genetic privacy and the law: an end to genetics exceptionalism. Jurimetrics. 2002; :21-58. View

5.
Cambon-Thomsen A, Thorisson G, Mabile L . The role of a bioresource research impact factor as an incentive to share human bioresources. Nat Genet. 2011; 43(6):503-4. DOI: 10.1038/ng.831. View