» Articles » PMID: 21779535

Systematic Review of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Predicting Clinical Benefit to Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal Am J Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2011 Jul 23
PMID 21779535
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pharmacogenetic testing can help identify patients with metastatic colorectal cancer more likely to respond to anti-EGFR therapy. We systematically reviewed the benefits and harms of EGFR-related pharmacogenetic testing of molecular targets downstream to KRAS in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. We searched five electronic databases from January 2000 through November 2010, and conducted separate grey literature and conference abstracts searches. Two reviewers independently assessed all articles for relevance and quality. We identified 27 studies, primarily fair- to marginal-quality, small retrospective, and single-arm cohort studies with significant overlap in patient populations. We identified seven studies that studied BRAF in independent patient populations, one that studied NRAS, four that studied PIK3CA, eight that studied PTEN expression, and five that studied AKT expression. The best evidence for BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA comes from the largest retrospective study (n=649) of chemorefractory patients from seven European countries. In this study, BRAF mutation was present in 6.5% of KRAS wild-type tumors. Only 8.3% of persons with BRAF mutations, compared to 38% of persons without BRAF mutations (p=0.0012), responded to chemotherapy with cetuximab. Clinical sensitivity and the false positive fraction (1- specificity) were estimated at 9.8% (95% CI 6.3, 14.5) and 1.6% (95% CI 0.2, 5.6), respectively. BRAF mutation was also associated with worse median progression-free survival (absolute difference 18 weeks, p<0.0001), and overall survival (absolute difference 28 weeks, p<0.0001). In the only study comparing outcomes in persons who did (n=227) and did not (n=332) receive cetuximab with combination chemotherapy, those with BRAF mutation had worse survival outcomes regardless of whether or not they received cetuximab. Although NRAS and PIK3CA exon 20 mutations were also associated with worse outcomes compared to persons without these mutations, evidence is based on a small number of identified mutations. Evidence for protein expression of PTEN and AKT is more sparse and limited by variable methods for assessing protein expression. Low-quality evidence addressing clinical validity of pharmacogenetic testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients suggests that BRAF mutations are associated with poorer treatment response and survival outcomes, although this association may be independent of treatment with EGFR inhibitors.

Citing Articles

Frequency and Clinicopathological Characteristics of Patients With Double-Mutant Colorectal Cancer: An Study.

Uchida S, Kojima T, Sugino T Pathol Oncol Res. 2022; 28:1610206.

PMID: 35280113 PMC: 8908457. DOI: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610206.


Combination of MEK Inhibitor and the JAK2-STAT3 Pathway Inhibition for the Therapy of Colon Cancer.

Jin J, Guo Q, Xie J, Jin D, Zhu Y Pathol Oncol Res. 2019; 25(2):769-775.

PMID: 30706361 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-019-00592-6.


Molecular characterization and biomarker identification in colorectal cancer: Toward realization of the precision medicine dream.

Goel G Cancer Manag Res. 2018; 10:5895-5908.

PMID: 30510457 PMC: 6250110. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S162967.


K-RAS and N-RAS mutations in testicular germ cell tumors.

Muhammet Hacioglu B, Kodaz H, Erdogan B, Cinkaya A, Tastekin E, Hacibekiroglu I Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2017; 17(2):159-163.

PMID: 28426398 PMC: 5474110. DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2017.1764.


Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Sepulveda A, Hamilton S, Allegra C, Grody W, Cushman-Vokoun A, Funkhouser W J Mol Diagn. 2017; 19(2):187-225.

PMID: 28185757 PMC: 5971222. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.11.001.


References
1.
Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, Sartore-Bianchi A, Arena S, Saletti P . Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(35):5705-12. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0786. View

2.
Tol J, Nagtegaal I, Punt C . BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(1):98-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc0904160. View

3.
Perkins G, Lievre A, Ramacci C, Meatchi T, De Reynies A, Emile J . Additional value of EGFR downstream signaling phosphoprotein expression to KRAS status for response to anti-EGFR antibodies in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010; 127(6):1321-31. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25152. View

4.
Razis E, Briasoulis E, Vrettou E, Skarlos D, Papamichael D, Kostopoulos I . Potential value of PTEN in predicting cetuximab response in colorectal cancer: an exploratory study. BMC Cancer. 2008; 8:234. PMC: 2527615. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-234. View

5.
Reitsma J, Glas A, Rutjes A, Scholten R, Bossuyt P, Zwinderman A . Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58(10):982-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022. View