» Articles » PMID: 21771296

Monitoring the Level of Government Trust, Risk Perception and Intention of the General Public to Adopt Protective Measures During the Influenza A (H1N1) Pandemic in The Netherlands

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Jul 21
PMID 21771296
Citations 168
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: During the course of an influenza pandemic, governments know relatively little about the possibly changing influence of government trust, risk perception, and receipt of information on the public's intention to adopt protective measures or on the acceptance of vaccination. This study aims to identify and describe possible changes in and factors associated with public's intentions during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands.

Methods: Sixteen cross-sectional telephone surveys were conducted (N = 8060) between April - November 2009. From these repeated measurements three consecutive periods were categorized based on crucial events during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic. Time trends in government trust, risk perception, intention to adopt protective measures, and the acceptance of vaccination were analysed. Factors associated with an intention to adopt protective measures or vaccination were identified.

Results: Trust in the government was high, but decreased over time. During the course of the pandemic, perceived vulnerability and an intention to adopt protective measures increased. Trust and vulnerability were associated with an intention to adopt protective measures in general only during period one. Higher levels of intention to receive vaccination were associated with increased government trust, fear/worry, and perceived vulnerability. In periods two and three receipt of information was positively associated with an intention to adopt protective measures. Most respondents wanted to receive information about infection prevention from municipal health services, health care providers, and the media.

Conclusions: The Dutch response to the H1N1 virus was relatively muted. Higher levels of trust in the government, fear/worry, and perceived vulnerability were all positively related to an intention to accept vaccination. Only fear/worry was positively linked to an intention to adopt protective measures during the entire pandemic. Risk and crisis communication by the government should focus on building and maintaining trust by providing information about preventing infection in close collaboration with municipal health services, health care providers, and the media.

Citing Articles

How Authoritative Media and Personal Social Media Influence Policy Compliance Through Trust in Government and Risk Perception: Quantitative Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Zhang H, Yang C, Deng X, Luo C J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e64940.

PMID: 39832177 PMC: 11791448. DOI: 10.2196/64940.


Political trust in the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey in Denmark and Sweden.

Kallemose T, Kirk J, Karlsson E, Seing I, Stefansdottir N, Vrangbaek K BMC Glob Public Health. 2024; 1(1):12.

PMID: 39681868 PMC: 11622888. DOI: 10.1186/s44263-023-00009-2.


COVID-19 and Health-care Business Continuity in Africa: Perceptions of Risks and Vulnerabilities by Mid-level Management Staff in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Ndubuisi M, Akoria O, Obaseki D, Gregrey O Ann Afr Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39440533 PMC: 11837828. DOI: 10.4103/aam.aam_145_21.


A practical agenda for incorporating trust into pandemic preparedness and response.

Bollyky T, Petersen M Bull World Health Organ. 2024; 102(6):440-447.

PMID: 38812800 PMC: 11132164. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.23.289979.


Perceptions and Information-Seeking Behavior Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination Among Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease in 2023: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Enilama O, MacDonald C, Thompson P, Khan U, Allu S, Beaucage M Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2024; 11:20543581241242550.

PMID: 38628809 PMC: 11020724. DOI: 10.1177/20543581241242550.


References
1.
Raude J, Setbon M . Lay perceptions of the pandemic influenza threat. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009; 24(7):339-42. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-009-9351-x. View

2.
Seale H, McLaws M, Heywood A, Ward K, Lowbridge C, Van D . The community's attitude towards swine flu and pandemic influenza. Med J Aust. 2009; 191(5):267-9. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02781.x. View

3.
Quinn S, Kumar S, Freimuth V, Kidwell K, Musa D . Public willingness to take a vaccine or drug under Emergency Use Authorization during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Biosecur Bioterror. 2009; 7(3):275-90. PMC: 2998968. DOI: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0041. View

4.
Vaughan E, Tinker T . Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99 Suppl 2:S324-32. PMC: 4504362. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537. View

5.
James Rubin G, Amlot R, Page L, Wessely S . Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2651. PMC: 2714687. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2651. View