» Articles » PMID: 21769569

Primary Care Physicians' Awareness, Experience and Opinions of Direct-to-consumer Genetic Testing

Overview
Journal J Genet Couns
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Genetics
Date 2011 Jul 20
PMID 21769569
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess primary care physicians' awareness, experience, opinions and preparedness to answer patients' questions regarding direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. An anonymous survey was mailed to 2,402 family and internal medicine providers in North Carolina. Of the 382 respondents, 38.7% (n = 148) were aware of and 15% (n = 59) felt prepared to answer questions about DTC genetic tests. Respondents aged 50 or older were more likely to be aware of DTC genetic testing than those less than 40 years old (OR = 2.42). Male providers were more likely to feel prepared to answer questions than female providers (OR = 2.65). Among respondents who reportedly were aware, family practitioners were more likely than internists (OR = 3.30) to think DTC testing was clinically useful, and 18.9% had patients ask questions or bring in test results. The small percent of physicians who were aware of DTC genetic testing or felt prepared to answer questions about it suggests that education of providers will be necessary if testing becomes more widespread.

Citing Articles

Readiness of Primary Healthcare Physicians for Providing Genetic Services.

Almalki A Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78031.

PMID: 40013188 PMC: 11864841. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78031.


General practitioners' (GPs) experience, attitudes and needs on clinical genetic services: a systematic review.

Ong C, Fok R, Tan R, Fung S, Sun S, Ngeow J Fam Med Community Health. 2022; 10(4).

PMID: 36450397 PMC: 9717000. DOI: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001515.


Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review of healthcare professionals' knowledge and views, and ethical and legal concerns.

Martins M, Murry L, Telford L, Moriarty F Eur J Hum Genet. 2022; 30(12):1331-1343.

PMID: 36220915 PMC: 9553629. DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01205-8.


Survey of Professionals of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA) towards Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.

Beccia F, Hoxhaj I, Sassano M, Stojanovic J, Acampora A, Pastorino R Eur J Public Health. 2022; 33(1):139-145.

PMID: 36179240 PMC: 9898004. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac139.


Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.

Cernat A, Bashir N, Ungar W J Community Genet. 2022; 13(2):155-170.

PMID: 35171498 PMC: 8941003. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00582-3.


References
1.
Guttmacher A, Jenkins J, Uhlmann W . Genomic medicine: who will practice it? A call to open arms. Am J Med Genet. 2002; 106(3):216-22. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.10008. View

2.
Caulfield T . The informed gatekeeper?: a commentary on genetic tests, marketing pressure and the role of primary care physicians. Health Law Rev. 2005; 9(3):14-8. View

3.
Evans J, Dale D, Fomous C . Preparing for a consumer-driven genomic age. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(12):1099-103. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1006202. View

4.
Williams-Jones B . Where there's a web, there's a way: commercial genetic testing and the Internet. Community Genet. 2003; 6(1):46-57. DOI: 10.1159/000069538. View

5.
Morren M, Rijken M, Baanders A, Bensing J . Perceived genetic knowledge, attitudes towards genetic testing, and the relationship between these among patients with a chronic disease. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 65(2):197-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.07.005. View