» Articles » PMID: 21766898

Great Expectations: What Do Patients Using Complementary and Alternative Medicine Hope For?

Overview
Journal Patient
Specialty Health Services
Date 2011 Jul 20
PMID 21766898
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this review is to summarize the published evidence regarding the expectations of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) users. We conducted electronic searches in MEDLINE and a hand search of our own files. Seventy-three articles met our inclusion criteria. A wide range of expectations emerged. In order of prevalence, they included hope to influence the natural history of the disease; disease prevention and health/general well-being promotion; fewer side effects; being in control over one's health; symptom relief; boosting the immune system; emotional support; holistic care; improving quality of life; relief of side effects of conventional medicine; good therapeutic relationship; obtaining information; coping better with illness; supporting the natural healing process; and availability of treatment. It is concluded that the expectations of CAM users are currently not rigorously investigated. Future studies should have a clear focus on specific aspects of this broad question.

Citing Articles

Working with patients' treatment expectations - what we can learn from homeopathy.

Wilhelm M, Hermann C, Rief W, Schedlowski M, Bingel U, Winkler A Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1398865.

PMID: 38860049 PMC: 11163137. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1398865.


Prevalence and predictive factors of complementary medicine use during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 in the Netherlands.

Mulder L, Busch M, Kristoffersen A, Nordberg J, van der Werf E BMC Complement Med Ther. 2022; 22(1):43.

PMID: 35168630 PMC: 8845358. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-022-03528-x.


Individualized health-related quality of life instrument Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) and its adaptations: a critical appraisal.

Ishaque S, Johnson J, Vohra S Qual Life Res. 2018; 28(4):879-893.

PMID: 30426277 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-2046-6.


Usage, biological activity, and safety of selected botanical dietary supplements consumed in the United States.

Benatrehina P, Pan L, Naman C, Li J, Kinghorn A J Tradit Complement Med. 2018; 8(2):267-277.

PMID: 29736381 PMC: 5934707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2018.01.006.


Herbal Products and Dietary Supplements: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Use, Attitudes, and Knowledge Among the Lebanese Population.

El Khoury G, Ramadan W, Zeeni N J Community Health. 2015; 41(3):566-73.

PMID: 26659604 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-015-0131-0.


References
1.
Reid S . A survey of the use of over-the-counter homeopathic medicines purchased in health stores in central Manchester. Homeopathy. 2002; 91(4):225-9. DOI: 10.1054/homp.2002.0053. View

2.
Risberg T, Kaasa S, Wist E, Melsom H . Why are cancer patients using non-proven complementary therapies? A cross-sectional multicentre study in Norway. Eur J Cancer. 1997; 33(4):575-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00504-7. View

3.
Menniti-Ippolito F, Gargiulo L, Bologna E, Forcella E, Raschetti R . Use of unconventional medicine in Italy: a nation-wide survey. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 58(1):61-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00228-002-0435-8. View

4.
Werneke U, Earl J, Seydel C, Horn O, Crichton P, Fannon D . Potential health risks of complementary alternative medicines in cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2004; 90(2):408-13. PMC: 2410154. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601560. View

5.
Price D, Finniss D, Benedetti F . A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: recent advances and current thought. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007; 59:565-90. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.113006.095941. View