» Articles » PMID: 21765629

Protocols for Late Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles

Overview
Journal Semin Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2011 Jul 19
PMID 21765629
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper describes the protocols used at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) to protract the maxilla during early adolescence. It is a modification of techniques introduced by Eric Liou with his Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Constriction (ALT-RAMEC) technique. The main differences between the CHLA protocol and previous maxillary protraction protocols are the age the protraction is attempted, the sutural loosening by alternating weekly expansion with constriction and the use of Class III elastics to support and redirect the protraction by nightly facemask wear. The CHLA protocol entirely depends on patient compliance and must be carefully taught and monitored. In a cooperative patient, the technique can correct a Class III malocclusion that previously would have been treated with LeFort 1 maxillary advancement surgery. Thus, it is not appropriate for patients requiring 2 jaw surgeries to correct mandibular prognathism, occlusal cants or facial asymmetry. The maxillary protraction appears to work by a combination of skeletal advancement, dental compensation and rotation of the occlusal planes. Microscrew/microimplant/temporary anchorage devices have been used with these maxillary protraction protocols to assist in expanding the maxilla, increasing skeletal anchorage during protraction, limiting dental compensations and reducing skeletal relapse.

Citing Articles

A Review of Orthodontic Considerations before and after Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

Cabrera C Acta Med Philipp. 2025; 58(21):7-19.

PMID: 39758297 PMC: 11694040. DOI: 10.47895/amp.vi0.6985.


Comparison of changes in the nasal cavity, pharyngeal airway, and maxillary sinus volumes after expansion and maxillary protraction with two protocols: Rapid palatal expansion versus alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction.

Liu W, Zhou S, Yen E, Zou B Korean J Orthod. 2023; 53(3):175-184.

PMID: 37150754 PMC: 10212776. DOI: 10.4041/kjod22.075.


Rationale and design for efficacy and safety evaluation of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction (BAMP) for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate with skeletal anterior crossbite: a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised prospective study....

Shimada E, Kanetaka H, Yamauchi K, Takahashi T, Nochioka K, Igarashi K BMJ Open. 2022; 12(9):e061831.

PMID: 36581967 PMC: 9438208. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061831.


Effect of adding daytime Class III Elastics to the alternate rapid maxillary expansion-constriction and reverse headgear therapy - A randomized clinical trial.

James J, Sundareswaran S, Davis S J Orthod Sci. 2020; 9:13.

PMID: 33354539 PMC: 7749451. DOI: 10.4103/jos.JOS_71_19.


The immediate effect of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions on the alveolus: a retrospective cone beam computed tomography study.

Gandedkar N, Liou E Prog Orthod. 2018; 19(1):40.

PMID: 30318565 PMC: 6186528. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-018-0237-x.


References
1.
Ranta R . Orthodontic treatment in adults with cleft lip and palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1989; 17 Suppl 1:42-4. DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(89)80041-1. View

2.
Mars M, HOUSTON W . A preliminary study of facial growth and morphology in unoperated male unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects over 13 years of age. Cleft Palate J. 1990; 27(1):7-10. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0007:apsofg>2.3.co;2. View

3.
Ross R . Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987; 24(1):5-77. View

4.
Buschang P, Porter C, Genecov E, Genecov D, Sayler K . Face mask therapy of preadolescents with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64(2):145-50. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1994)064<0145:FMTOPW>2.0.CO;2. View

5.
Rachmiel A . Treatment of maxillary cleft palate: distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery--part one: Maxillary distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(4):753-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.08.010. View