» Articles » PMID: 21756032

Gender Differences of Airway Dimensions in Anatomically Matched Sites on CT in Smokers

Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: There are limited data on, and controversies regarding gender differences in the airway dimensions of smokers. Multi-detector CT (MDCT) images were analyzed to examine whether gender could explain differences in airway dimensions of anatomically matched airways in smokers.

Materials And Methods: We used VIDA imaging software to analyze MDCT scans from 2047 smokers (M:F, 1021:1026) from the COPDGene® cohort. The airway dimensions were analyzed from segmental to subsubsegmental bronchi. We compared the differences of luminal area, inner diameter, wall thickness, wall area percentage (WA%) for each airway between men and women, and multiple linear regression including covariates (age, gender, body sizes, and other relevant confounding factors) was used to determine the predictors of each airway dimensions.

Results: Lumen area, internal diameter and wall thickness were smaller for women than men in all measured airway (18.4 vs 22.5 mm(2) for segmental bronchial lumen area, 10.4 vs 12.5 mm(2) for subsegmental bronchi, 6.5 vs 7.7 mm(2) for subsubsegmental bronchi, respectively p < 0.001). However, women had greater WA% in subsegmental and subsubsegmental bronchi. In multivariate regression, gender remained one of the most significant predictors of WA%, lumen area, inner diameter and wall thickness.

Conclusion: Women smokers have higher WA%, but lower luminal area, internal diameter and airway thickness in anatomically matched airways as measured by CT scan than do male smokers. This difference may explain, in part, gender differences in the prevalence of COPD and airflow limitation.

Citing Articles

HIP: a method for high-dimensional multi-view data integration and prediction accounting for subgroup heterogeneity.

Butts J, Verace L, Wendt C, Bowler R, Hersh C, Long Q Brief Bioinform. 2024; 25(6).

PMID: 39344710 PMC: 11440091. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae470.


Reprint of: Smoking and pulmonary health in women: A narrative review and behavioral health perspective.

Menson K, Coleman S Prev Med. 2024; 188:108113.

PMID: 39198081 PMC: 11563853. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108113.


Three-Dimensional Assessment of Upper Airway Volume and Morphology in Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Patterns.

Pop S, Procopciuc A, Arsintescu B, Mitariu M, Mitariu L, Pop R Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 38732317 PMC: 11083622. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14090903.


Sex-differences in COPD: from biological mechanisms to therapeutic considerations.

Milne K, Mitchell R, Ferguson O, Hind A, Guenette J Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1289259.

PMID: 38572156 PMC: 10989064. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1289259.


Investigating distributions of inhaled aerosols in the lungs of post-COVID-19 clusters through a unified imaging and modeling approach.

Zhang X, Li F, Rajaraman P, Comellas A, Hoffman E, Lin C Eur J Pharm Sci. 2024; 195():106724.

PMID: 38340875 PMC: 10948263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106724.


References
1.
Palagyi K, Tschirren J, Sonka M . Quantitative analysis of intrathoracic airway trees: methods and validation. Inf Process Med Imaging. 2004; 18:222-33. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45087-0_19. View

2.
Aysola R, Hoffman E, Gierada D, Wenzel S, Cook-Granroth J, Tarsi J . Airway remodeling measured by multidetector CT is increased in severe asthma and correlates with pathology. Chest. 2008; 134(6):1183-1191. PMC: 2859729. DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-2779. View

3.
Kim W, Silverman E, Hoffman E, Criner G, Mosenifar Z, Sciurba F . CT metrics of airway disease and emphysema in severe COPD. Chest. 2009; 136(2):396-404. PMC: 2733947. DOI: 10.1378/chest.08-2858. View

4.
Camp P, Coxson H, Levy R, Pillai S, Anderson W, Vestbo J . Sex differences in emphysema and airway disease in smokers. Chest. 2009; 136(6):1480-1488. DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-0676. View

5.
Martinez F, Curtis J, Sciurba F, Mumford J, Giardino N, Weinmann G . Sex differences in severe pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007; 176(3):243-52. PMC: 1994221. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200606-828OC. View