» Articles » PMID: 21751225

Principles for the Ethical Analysis of Clinical and Translational Research

Overview
Journal Stat Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Jul 14
PMID 21751225
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Statistical analysis is a cornerstone of the scientific method and evidence-based medicine, and statisticians serve an increasingly important role in clinical and translational research by providing objective evidence concerning the risks and benefits of novel therapeutics. Researchers rely on statistics and informatics as never before to generate and test hypotheses and to discover patterns of disease hidden within overwhelming amounts of data. Too often, clinicians and biomedical scientists are not adequately proficient in statistics to analyze data or interpret results, and statistical expertise may not be properly incorporated within the research process. We argue for the ethical imperative of statistical standards, and we present ten nontechnical principles that form a conceptual framework for the ethical application of statistics in clinical and translational research. These principles are drawn from the literature on the ethics of data analysis and the American Statistical Association Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice.

Citing Articles

Colchicine for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Marti-Carvajal A, Gemmato-Valecillos M, Monge Martin D, De Sanctis J, Marti-Amarista C, Hidalgo R Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 2:CD015003.

PMID: 39927511 PMC: 11808834. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015003.pub2.


Reporting Standards for Bayesian Network Modelling.

Barons M, Hanea A, Mascaro S, Woodberry O Entropy (Basel). 2025; 27(1).

PMID: 39851689 PMC: 11765109. DOI: 10.3390/e27010069.


Outcomes in infants < 29 weeks of gestation following single-dose prophylactic indomethacin.

Gillam-Krakauer M, Slaughter J, Cotton R, Robinson B, Reese J, Maitre N J Perinatol. 2020; 41(1):109-118.

PMID: 32948814 PMC: 7499931. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-020-00814-9.


Comprehensive survey among statistical members of medical ethics committees in Germany on their personal impression of completeness and correctness of biostatistical aspects of submitted study protocols.

Rauch G, Hafermann L, Mansmann U, Pigeot I BMJ Open. 2020; 10(2):e032864.

PMID: 32024788 PMC: 7044913. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032864.


New guidance to improve sample size calculations for trials: eliciting the target difference.

Bell M Trials. 2018; 19(1):605.

PMID: 30396364 PMC: 6219024. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2894-y.


References
1.
MacArthur R, JACKSON G . An evaluation of the use of statistical methodology in the Journal of Infectious Diseases. J Infect Dis. 1984; 149(3):349-54. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/149.3.349. View

2.
Harris J . In praise of unprincipled ethics. J Med Ethics. 2003; 29(5):303-6. PMC: 1733790. DOI: 10.1136/jme.29.5.303. View

3.
Laine C, Goodman S, Griswold M, Sox H . Reproducible research: moving toward research the public can really trust. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146(6):450-3. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-6-200703200-00154. View

4.
Altman D . Statistics and ethics in medical research: study design. Br Med J. 1980; 281(6250):1267-9. PMC: 1714604. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.281.6250.1267. View

5.
Roseman M, Milette K, Bero L, Coyne J, Lexchin J, Turner E . Reporting of conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of trials of pharmacological treatments. JAMA. 2011; 305(10):1008-17. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.257. View