» Articles » PMID: 21741553

Sensory Integration for Reaching: Models of Optimality in the Context of Behavior and the Underlying Neural Circuits

Overview
Journal Prog Brain Res
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Jul 12
PMID 21741553
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although multisensory integration has been well modeled at the behavioral level, the link between these behavioral models and the underlying neural circuits is still not clear. This gap is even greater for the problem of sensory integration during movement planning and execution. The difficulty lies in applying simple models of sensory integration to the complex computations that are required for movement control and to the large networks of brain areas that perform these computations. Here I review psychophysical, computational, and physiological work on multisensory integration during movement planning, with an emphasis on goal-directed reaching. I argue that sensory transformations must play a central role in any modeling effort. In particular, the statistical properties of these transformations factor heavily into the way in which downstream signals are combined. As a result, our models of optimal integration are only expected to apply "locally," that is, independently for each brain area. I suggest that local optimality can be reconciled with globally optimal behavior if one views the collection of parietal sensorimotor areas not as a set of task-specific domains, but rather as a palette of complex, sensorimotor representations that are flexibly combined to drive downstream activity and behavior.

Citing Articles

The multisensory control of sequential actions.

Safstrom D Exp Brain Res. 2024; 243(1):13.

PMID: 39636442 PMC: 11621168. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06962-0.


Express Visuomotor Responses Reflect Knowledge of Both Target Locations and Contextual Rules during Reaches of Different Amplitudes.

Contemori S, Loeb G, Corneil B, Wallis G, Carroll T J Neurosci. 2023; 43(42):7041-7055.

PMID: 37714709 PMC: 10586536. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2069-22.2023.


Hippocampal blood flow rapidly and preferentially increases after a bout of moderate-intensity exercise in older adults with poor cerebrovascular health.

Palmer J, Morris J, Billinger S, Lepping R, Martin L, Green Z Cereb Cortex. 2022; 33(9):5297-5306.

PMID: 36255379 PMC: 10152056. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac418.


Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees.

Guemann M, Halgand C, Bastier A, Lansade C, Borrini L, Lapeyre E J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022; 19(1):59.

PMID: 35690860 PMC: 9188052. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01038-y.


How Tilting the Head Interferes With Eye-Hand Coordination: The Role of Gravity in Visuo-Proprioceptive, Cross-Modal Sensory Transformations.

Bernard-Espina J, Dal Canto D, Beraneck M, McIntyre J, Tagliabue M Front Integr Neurosci. 2022; 16:788905.

PMID: 35359704 PMC: 8961421. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2022.788905.


References
1.
SNYDER L, Batista A, Andersen R . Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature. 1997; 386(6621):167-70. DOI: 10.1038/386167a0. View

2.
Cavada C . The visual parietal areas in the macaque monkey: current structural knowledge and ignorance. Neuroimage. 2001; 14(1 Pt 2):S21-6. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0818. View

3.
Buneo C, Jarvis M, Batista A, Andersen R . Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature. 2002; 416(6881):632-6. DOI: 10.1038/416632a. View

4.
Pouget A, Deneve S, Duhamel J . A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(9):741-7. DOI: 10.1038/nrn914. View

5.
Meredith M, Stein B . Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. J Neurophysiol. 1986; 56(3):640-62. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1986.56.3.640. View