» Articles » PMID: 21736451

Similarity Between Brain Activity at Encoding and Retrieval Predicts Successful Realization of Delayed Intentions

Overview
Journal J Cogn Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Jul 9
PMID 21736451
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Remembering delayed intentions can be highly demanding. Accuracy in laboratory paradigms assessing prospective memory (PM) is typically well below ceiling, and failure to remember intended behaviors after a delay is a common occurrence in everyday life. However, relatively little is known of the potential differences in brain activity that distinguish successful versus unsuccessful PM. In this fMRI study, participants repeatedly encoded, stored, and then had the opportunity to retrieve intended behaviors while engaged in a distracting ongoing task. This yielded a success rate of approximately two thirds. Overall levels of brain activity distinguished successful versus unsuccessful trials at all three stages (encoding, storage, and retrieval), suggesting multiple neural determinants of PM success. In addition, the voxelwise similarity between patterns of brain activity at encoding and retrieval was greater for successful than unsuccessful trials. This was true even in posterior cingulate, which showed opposite patterns of signal change between encoding and retrieval. Thus, successful realization of delayed intentions may be associated with reinstatement of encoding context at the time of retrieval.

Citing Articles

Higher-dimensional neural representations predict better episodic memory.

Sheng J, Zhang L, Liu C, Liu J, Feng J, Zhou Y Sci Adv. 2022; 8(16):eabm3829.

PMID: 35442734 PMC: 9020666. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abm3829.


Thought probes during prospective memory encoding: Evidence for perfunctory processes.

Scullin M, McDaniel M, Dasse M, Lee J, Kurinec C, Tami C PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0198646.

PMID: 29874277 PMC: 5991366. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198646.


Proactive Recruitment of Frontoparietal and Salience Networks for Voluntary Decisions.

Rens N, Bode S, Burianova H, Cunnington R Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 11:610.

PMID: 29311873 PMC: 5733024. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00610.


Neural evidence of the strategic choice between working memory and episodic memory in prospective remembering.

Lewis-Peacock J, Cohen J, Norman K Neuropsychologia. 2016; 93(Pt A):280-288.

PMID: 27845034 PMC: 5148635. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.006.


Effects of cue focality on the neural mechanisms of prospective memory: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Cona G, Bisiacchi P, Sartori G, Scarpazza C Sci Rep. 2016; 6:25983.

PMID: 27185531 PMC: 4868976. DOI: 10.1038/srep25983.