» Articles » PMID: 21735285

[Extraesophageal Reflux. Overview and Discussion of a New Method for PH Monitoring]

Overview
Journal HNO
Date 2011 Jul 8
PMID 21735285
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Extraesophageal reflux disease often requires diagnosis and treatment by a phoniatry or ear, nose and throat specialist. The disease needs to be differentiated from gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Objective: A new oropharyngeal pH measuring system with a single channel probe has recently been introduced. The aim of this study was to compare oropharyngeal pH-metry with the existing diagnostic methods for extraesophageal reflux disease and to present initial results in our own patients.

Methods: A literature search for oropharyngeal pH-metry was performed in the databases NHS EED, HTA, DARE, Clinical trials, Cochrane reviews and Medline/PubMed. A selective literature search was also carried out on the problem of extraesophageal reflux disease.

Results: Evaluation scales, trial proton pump inhibitor therapy or pH-metry, for example, can be used to diagnose extraesophageal reflux disease. pH-metry can be performed using a classical two-channel pH-metry system; a new oropharyngeal pH measuring system has recently been introduced. This new method has been evaluated in initial studies for normative data and has been compared to two-channel pH-metry. Prospective randomised studies to diagnose extraesophageal reflux disease with the new oropharyngeal pH-metry method are still lacking.

Discussion: Oropharyngeal pH-metry has some potential advantages compared to classical two-channel pH-metry; however, a lot of questions remain unanswered. These will be discussed and illustrated with the help of a number of own patient case reports.

Citing Articles

[Pharyngeal acid load and different functional endoscopy findings].

Michel F, Dannesberger R, Stroh T, Fritsche R, Ahrens P HNO. 2019; 67(12):940-947.

PMID: 31407018 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-019-0723-6.


Relationship between functional endoscopy and impedance-pH measurement.

Michel F, Stroh T, Fritsche R, Ahrens P HNO. 2017; 65(Suppl 2):116-121.

PMID: 28303290 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0317-5.


[Relationship between functional endoscopy and impedance-pH measurement. German version].

Michel F, Stroh T, Fritsche R, Ahrens P HNO. 2017; 65(8):657-662.

PMID: 28150011 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0313-9.


[Laryngopharyngeal reflux and larynx-related symptoms].

Ptok M, Ptok A HNO. 2012; 60(3):200-5.

PMID: 22402900 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-011-2441-6.

References
1.
Sudhoff H, Euteneuer S, Dazert S, Schmidt-Choudhury A, Schreiber S . [Gastroesophageal reflux (GER)--cause of otitis media with effusion in childhood?]. HNO. 2004; 52(1):8-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00106-003-0999-3. View

2.
Barry D, Vaezi M . Laryngopharyngeal reflux: More questions than answers. Cleve Clin J Med. 2010; 77(5):327-34. DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.77a.09121. View

3.
Richter J . Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring. Am J Med. 1998; 103(5A):130S-134S. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)00338-0. View

4.
Koufman J . The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of.... Laryngoscope. 1991; 101(4 Pt 2 Suppl 53):1-78. DOI: 10.1002/lary.1991.101.s53.1. View

5.
Belafsky P . PRO: Empiric treatment with PPIs is not appropriate without testing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101(1):6-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00448_2.x. View