Force Synchrony Enhances the Stability of Rhythmic Multi-joint Arm Coordination

Overview

Journal Exp Brain Res

Specialty Neurology

Date 2011 Jul 8

PMID 21735246

Authors

Jelena Stosic

Timothy J Carroll

Aymar de Rugy

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although rhythmic coordination has been extensively studied in the literature, questions remain about the correspondence of constraints that have been identified in the related contexts of inter-limb and intra-limb coordination. Here we used a 2-DOF robot arm which allows flexible manipulation of forces to investigate the effect on coordination stability of intra-limb coordination of: (i) the synchrony of force requirements and (ii) the involvement of bi-functional muscles. Ten subjects produced simultaneous rhythmic flexion-extension (FE) and supination-pronation (SP) elbow movements in two coordination patterns: (1) flexion synchronized with supination/extension with pronation (in-phase pattern) and (2) flexion synchronized with pronation/extension with supination (anti-phase pattern). The movements were produced with five different settings of the robot arm: a neutral setting that imposed balanced force requirements, and four other settings that increased the force requirements for one direction in both DOF. When combined with specific coordination patterns, these settings created conditions in which either synchronous or alternate patterns of forcing were necessary to perform the task. Results showed that synchronous tasks were more stable than asynchronous tasks (P < 0.05). Within the synchronous tasks, some robot settings were designed to either increase or decrease the use of bi-functional muscles. Although there was no difference for the bi-functional muscle biceps brachii, the coordination was more stable for the condition in which the greatest force requirements corresponded to the mechanical action of the bi-functional pronator teres (P < 0.05). In conclusion, force synchrony increases the stability of rhythmic intra-limb coordination, but further research is needed to clarify the role of bi-functional muscles in this effect.

References

Buchanan J . Learning a single limb multijoint coordination pattern: the impact of a mechanical constraint on the coordination dynamics of learning and transfer. Exp Brain Res. 2003; 156(1):39-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1763-3. View

Salesse R, Oullier O, Temprado J . Plane of motion mediates the coalition of constraints in rhythmic bimanual coordination. J Mot Behav. 2005; 37(6):454-64. DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.37.6.454-464. View

Russell D, Sternad D . Sinusoidal visuomotor tracking: intermittent servo-control or coupled oscillations?. J Mot Behav. 2001; 33(4):329-49. DOI: 10.1080/00222890109601918. View

Buchanan J, Zihlman K, Ryu Y, Wright D . Learning and transfer of a relative phase pattern and a joint amplitude ratio in a rhythmic multijoint arm movement. J Mot Behav. 2007; 39(1):49-67. DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.39.1.49-67. View

Baldissera F, Cavallari P, Civaschi P . Preferential coupling between voluntary movements of ipsilateral limbs. Neurosci Lett. 1982; 34(1):95-100. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(82)90098-2. View

Hoy M, Zernicke R . The role of intersegmental dynamics during rapid limb oscillations. J Biomech. 1986; 19(10):867-77. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(86)90137-5. View

Shemmell J, Forner M, Tresilian J, Riek S, Barry B, Carson R . Neuromuscular adaptation during skill acquisition on a two degree-of-freedom target-acquisition task: isometric torque production. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94(5):3046-57. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00670.2004. View

Kelso J, Buchanan J, Wallace S . Order parameters for the neural organization of single, multijoint limb movement patterns. Exp Brain Res. 1991; 85(2):432-44. DOI: 10.1007/BF00229420. View

Dounskaia N, Swinnen S, Walter C, Spaepen A, Verschueren S . Hierarchical control of different elbow-wrist coordination patterns. Exp Brain Res. 1998; 121(3):239-54. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050457. View

10.

Cohen L . Synchronous bimanual movements performed by homologous and non-homologous muscles. Percept Mot Skills. 1971; 32(2):639-44. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1971.32.2.639. View

11.

Buchanan J, Kelso J . Posturally induced transitions in rhythmic multijoint limb movements. Exp Brain Res. 1993; 94(1):131-42. DOI: 10.1007/BF00230476. View

12.

de Rugy A, Riek S, Carson R . Influence of predominant patterns of coordination on the exploitation of interaction torques in a two-joint rhythmic arm movement. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 175(3):439-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0562-z. View

13.

Dounskaia N, Ketcham C, Stelmach G . Commonalities and differences in control of various drawing movements. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 146(1):11-25. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1144-3. View

14.

de Rugy A, Riek S, Oytam Y, Carroll T, Davoodi R, Carson R . Neuromuscular and biomechanical factors codetermine the solution to motor redundancy in rhythmic multijoint arm movement. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 189(4):421-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1437-2. View

15.

Carroll T, Barry B, Riek S, Carson R . Resistance training enhances the stability of sensorimotor coordination. Proc Biol Sci. 2001; 268(1464):221-7. PMC: 1088595. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1356. View

16.

Jamison J, Caldwell G . Muscle synergies and isometric torque production: influence of supination and pronation level on elbow flexion. J Neurophysiol. 1993; 70(3):947-60. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.3.947. View

17.

de Rugy A, Riek S, Carson R . Neuromuscular-skeletal origins of predominant patterns of coordination in rhythmic two-joint arm movement. J Mot Behav. 2006; 38(1):7-14. DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.38.1.7-14. View

18.

Carson R, Oytam Y, Riek S . Artificial gravity reveals that economy of action determines the stability of sensorimotor coordination. PLoS One. 2009; 4(4):e5248. PMC: 2664928. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005248. View

19.

Temprado J, Swinnen S, Carson R, Tourment A, Laurent M . Interaction of directional, neuromuscular and egocentric constraints on the stability of preferred bimanual coordination patterns. Hum Mov Sci. 2003; 22(3):339-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9457(03)00049-6. View