» Articles » PMID: 21727272

Physical Activity Awareness of British Adolescents

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2011 Jul 6
PMID 21727272
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess adolescent physical activity (PA) awareness and to investigate associations with biologic and psychosocial factors.

Design: Cross-sectional study from November 1, 2005, through July 31, 2007 (the ROOTS study).

Setting: Population-based sample recruited from Cambridgeshire and Suffolk schools (United Kingdom).

Participants: Of 799 participants, 43.6% were male. The mean (SD) age was 14.5 (0.5) years.

Main Exposures: Self-rated PA perception, self-reported psychosocial factors, and measured anthropometry.

Main Outcome Measures: We measured PA with accelerometry for 5 days. Inactive was defined as less than 60 minutes per day of moderate and vigorous PA (MVPA) measured by accelerometry. Associations between awareness (agreement between self-rated and accelerometry-measured active/inactive) and potential correlates were investigated using multinomial logistic regression.

Results: Approximately 70.1% of adolescents were inactive (81.2% of girls and 55.8% of boys; odds ratio [OR], 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.41-4.82). There were 52.6% of all girls (64.8% of inactive girls) and 33.6% of all boys (60.3% of inactive boys) who inaccurately rated themselves as active (overestimators). Compared with girls accurately describing themselves as inactive (28.6%), girl overestimators had lower fat mass (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-0.99), higher socioeconomic status (high vs low OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.07-5.32), more parent support (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.12-2.22), and better family relationships (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09- 0.67). Among boys accurately describing themselves as inactive (22.1%), overestimators had lower fat mass (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96) and reported more peer support (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.32-2.30) and less teasing (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92).

Conclusions: A substantial number of adolescents believe themselves to be more physically active than they really are. They may be unaware of potential health risks and unlikely to participate in PA promotion programs. Increasing information of PA health benefits beyond weight control might encourage behavior change.

Citing Articles

Compensatory behavior of physical activity in adolescents - a qualitative analysis of the underlying mechanisms and influencing factors.

Beck F, Swelam B, Dettweiler U, Krieger C, Reimers A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):158.

PMID: 38212791 PMC: 10785364. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17519-1.


Formative Evaluation of a Home-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Adolescent Girls-The HERizon Project: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Cowley E, Watson P, Foweather L, Belton S, Mansfield C, Whitcomb-Khan G Children (Basel). 2021; 8(2).

PMID: 33499174 PMC: 7911217. DOI: 10.3390/children8020076.


Recognition of 16-18-Year-Old Adolescents for Guiding Physical Activity Interventions: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Bhatti S, Watkin E, Butterfill J, Li J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(14).

PMID: 32664602 PMC: 7400075. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17145002.


Awareness of wearing an accelerometer does not affect physical activity in youth.

Vanhelst J, Beghin L, Drumez E, Coopman S, Gottrand F BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017; 17(1):99.

PMID: 28693500 PMC: 5504551. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0378-5.


Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review.

Ridgers N, McNarry M, Mackintosh K JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016; 4(4):e129.

PMID: 27881359 PMC: 5143467. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.6540.