» Articles » PMID: 21717099

Neural Markers of Automatic and Controlled Attention During Immediate and Delayed Action

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Jul 1
PMID 21717099
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It has been shown that visually guided and memory-guided actions are under the control of dissociable neural systems. This experiment measured event-related potentials (ERPs) in a cross-modal dual-task paradigm to investigate the attentional requirements of these two types of actions. In a primary joystick-controlled continuous reciprocal aiming task, participants moved a cursor back and forth between two targets of variable size in visually guided (VIS) and memory-guided (MEM) conditions. In a secondary dichotic listening task, ERPs were collected while infrequent high and frequent low pitch tones were delivered to both ears. Participants responded to the infrequent tones delivered to only one attended ear. Aiming and listening were performed separately and together as a dual task. We were interested in two ERP components: the P300 component, which reflects voluntary attention, and the mismatch negativity (MMN), which reflects automatic attention. The results showed that the P300 component elicited by the auditory task was decreased in amplitude by the dual-task conditions compared with the auditory task alone. Moreover, P300 latency was increased by the MEM aiming condition, but not the VIS aiming condition. On the other hand, the MMN component elicited by the auditory task was only attenuated by the VIS aiming condition, not by the MEM aiming condition. Together, these results suggest that memory-guided aiming requires more voluntary attention and less automatic attention than visually guided aiming.

Citing Articles

ERPs Differentially Reflect Automatic and Deliberate Processing of the Functional Manipulability of Objects.

Madan C, Chen Y, Singhal A Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:360.

PMID: 27536224 PMC: 4971017. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00360.


Event-related potentials elicited by the Deutsch "high-low" word illusion in the patients with first-episode schizophrenia with auditory hallucinations.

Xu Y, Chai H, Zhang B, Gao Q, Fan H, Zheng L BMC Psychiatry. 2016; 16:33.

PMID: 26892784 PMC: 4758162. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0747-3.


P300 event-related potential as an indicator of inattentional deafness?.

Giraudet L, St-Louis M, Scannella S, Causse M PLoS One. 2015; 10(2):e0118556.

PMID: 25714746 PMC: 4340620. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118556.


A perception-based ERP reveals that the magnitude of delay matters for memory-guided reaching.

Cruikshank L, Caplan J, Singhal A Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232(7):2087-94.

PMID: 24691754 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3897-x.

References
1.
Passingham R . Attention to action. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996; 351(1346):1473-9. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0132. View

2.
Sirevaag E, Kramer A, Coles M, Donchin E . Resource reciprocity: an event-related brain potentials analysis. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1989; 70(1):77-97. DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(89)90061-9. View

3.
LaBar K, Gitelman D, Parrish T, Mesulam M . Neuroanatomic overlap of working memory and spatial attention networks: a functional MRI comparison within subjects. Neuroimage. 1999; 10(6):695-704. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0503. View

4.
Liu G, Healey C, Enns J . Target detection and localization in visual search: a dual systems perspective. Percept Psychophys. 2003; 65(5):678-94. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194806. View

5.
Mulert C, Pogarell O, Juckel G, Rujescu D, Giegling I, Rupp D . The neural basis of the P300 potential. Focus on the time-course of the underlying cortical generators. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004; 254(3):190-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00406-004-0469-2. View