» Articles » PMID: 21714316

Do Crack Smoking Practices Change with the Introduction of Safer Crack Kits?

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Public Health
Date 2011 Jul 1
PMID 21714316
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Crack smoking has increased in Vancouver despite the harms associated with its use. Many people who smoke crack share their equipment, thereby increasing their risk for infectious disease. This project explored the effects of outreach distribution of "safer crack kits" on smoking practices.

Methods: Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted, the first prior to kit distribution and the second a year later. Participants were individuals who smoked crack and lived in Vancouver's inner city. Crack smoking practices and use of items in the crack kit were documented.

Results: The results of the second survey (i.e., following 12 months of kit distribution) showed an increase in availability and use of safer use items; mouthpieces and condoms provided in the kit were used by 79% and 59% of recipients, respectively. Unsafe practices were reported post distribution: although 42% used brass screens, the majority reported that they usually used Brillo; over 40% of respondents reported using syringe plungers to scrape crack resin; and participants reported sharing crack-use paraphernalia.

Conclusion: While kit distribution made safer use items more accessible, its impact on safer use practice was limited. Our findings highlight the need for targeted distribution of safer use items. Future research should explore the dynamics of unsafe crack smoking practices and ways to leverage safer use messaging.

Citing Articles

The utilization and delivery of safer smoking practices and services: a narrative synthesis of the literature.

Tapper A, Ahern C, Graveline-Long Z, Newberger N, Hughto J Harm Reduct J. 2023; 20(1):160.

PMID: 37891658 PMC: 10612300. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00875-x.


Not all screens are created equal: examination of surface features and other physical properties of commonly used screen materials for smoking drugs.

Diak B, Miskovic M, Zurba N, Beaumont D Harm Reduct J. 2023; 20(1):68.

PMID: 37221542 PMC: 10207625. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-023-00794-x.


'Resurgent', 'twin' or 'silent' epidemic? A select data overview and observations on increasing psycho-stimulant use and harms in North America.

Fischer B, OKeefe-Markman C, Lee A, Daldegan-Bueno D Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021; 16(1):17.

PMID: 33588896 PMC: 7883758. DOI: 10.1186/s13011-021-00350-5.


From opiates to methamphetamine: building new harm reduction responses in Jakarta, Indonesia.

Rigoni R, Woods S, Breeksema J Harm Reduct J. 2019; 16(1):67.

PMID: 31829253 PMC: 6907268. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-019-0341-3.


Education and equipment for people who smoke crack cocaine in Canada: progress and limits.

Strike C, Watson T Harm Reduct J. 2017; 14(1):17.

PMID: 28494810 PMC: 5427547. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-017-0144-3.


References
1.
Porter J, Bonilla L . Crack users' cracked lips: an additional HIV risk factor. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83(10):1490-1. PMC: 1694867. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.10.1490-a. View

2.
Story A, Bothamley G, Hayward A . Crack cocaine and infectious tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008; 14(9):1466-9. PMC: 2603115. DOI: 10.3201/eid1409.070654. View

3.
Buxton J, Preston E, Mak S, Harvard S, Barley J . More than just needles: an evidence-informed approach to enhancing harm reduction supply distribution in British Columbia. Harm Reduct J. 2008; 5:37. PMC: 2627844. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7517-5-37. View

4.
Tortu S, McMahon J, Pouget E, Hamid R . Sharing of noninjection drug-use implements as a risk factor for hepatitis C. Subst Use Misuse. 2004; 39(2):211-24. DOI: 10.1081/ja-120028488. View

5.
Malchy L, Bungay V, Johnson J . Documenting practices and perceptions of 'safer' crack use: a Canadian pilot study. Int J Drug Policy. 2008; 19(4):339-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.06.005. View