» Articles » PMID: 21712958

Statistical Methods for Assays with Limits of Detection: Serum Bile Acid As a Differentiator Between Patients with Normal Colons, Adenomas, and Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal J Carcinog
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2011 Jun 30
PMID 21712958
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In analytic chemistry a detection limit (DL) is the lowest measurable amount of an analyte that can be distinguished from a blank; many biomedical measurement technologies exhibit this property. From a statistical perspective, these data present inferential challenges because instead of precise measures, one only has information that the value is somewhere between 0 and the DL (below detection limit, BDL). Substitution of BDL values, with 0 or the DL can lead to biased parameter estimates and a loss of statistical power. Statistical methods that make adjustments when dealing with these types of data, often called left-censored data, are available in many commercial statistical packages. Despite this availability, the use of these methods is still not widespread in biomedical literature. We have reviewed the statistical approaches of dealing with BDL values, and used simulations to examine the performance of the commonly used substitution methods and the most widely available statistical methods. We have illustrated these methods using a study undertaken at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, to examine the serum bile acid levels in patients with colorectal cancer and adenoma. We have found that the modern methods for BDL values identify disease-related differences that are often missed, with statistically naive approaches.

Citing Articles

Molecular pathways in reproductive cancers: a focus on prostate and ovarian cancer.

Ajayi A, Oyovwi M, Akano O, Akanbi G, Adisa F Cancer Cell Int. 2025; 25(1):33.

PMID: 39901204 PMC: 11792371. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-025-03658-5.


A Generalizable Evaluated Approach, Applying Advanced Geospatial Statistical Methods, to Identify High Lead Exposure Locations at Census Tract Scale: Michigan Case Study.

Xue J, Zartarian V, Tornero-Velez R, Stanek L, Poulakos A, Walts A Environ Health Perspect. 2022; 130(7):77004.

PMID: 35894594 PMC: 9327739. DOI: 10.1289/EHP9705.


Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus by dry fogging hypochlorous acid solution and hydrogen peroxide solution.

Urushidani M, Kawayoshi A, Kotaki T, Saeki K, Mori Y, Kameoka M PLoS One. 2022; 17(4):e0261802.

PMID: 35389997 PMC: 8989197. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261802.


BIKE: Dietary Exposure Model for Foodborne Microbiological and Chemical Hazards.

Ranta J, Mikkela A, Suomi J, Tuominen P Foods. 2021; 10(11).

PMID: 34828801 PMC: 8621415. DOI: 10.3390/foods10112520.


Thermoregulation is not impaired in breast cancer survivors during moderate-intensity exercise performed in warm and hot environments.

Relf R, Lee B, Eichhorn G, Flint M, Beale L, Maxwell N Physiol Rep. 2021; 9(14):e14968.

PMID: 34291605 PMC: 8295682. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14968.


References
1.
Bayerdorffer E, Mannes G, Richter W, Ochsenkuhn T, WIEBECKE B, Kopcke W . Increased serum deoxycholic acid levels in men with colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 1993; 104(1):145-51. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)90846-5. View

2.
Schisterman E, Vexler A, Whitcomb B, Liu A . The limitations due to exposure detection limits for regression models. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163(4):374-83. PMC: 1408541. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj039. View

3.
Willett W . The search for the causes of breast and colon cancer. Nature. 1989; 338(6214):389-94. DOI: 10.1038/338389a0. View

4.
Lachenbruch P . Analysis of data with excess zeros. Stat Methods Med Res. 2002; 11(4):297-302. DOI: 10.1191/0962280202sm289ra. View

5.
Lynn H . Maximum likelihood inference for left-censored HIV RNA data. Stat Med. 2001; 20(1):33-45. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010115)20:1<33::aid-sim640>3.0.co;2-o. View