» Articles » PMID: 21712802

Optimized PCR-based Detection of Mycoplasma

Overview
Journal J Vis Exp
Date 2011 Jun 30
PMID 21712802
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The maintenance of contamination-free cell lines is essential to cell-based research. Among the biggest contaminant concerns are mycoplasma contamination. Although mycoplasma do not usually kill contaminated cells, they are difficult to detect and can cause a variety of effects on cultured cells, including altered metabolism, slowed proliferation and chromosomal aberrations. In short, mycoplasma contamination compromises the value of those cell lines in providing accurate data for life science research. The sources of mycoplasma contamination in the laboratory are very challenging to completely control. As certain mycoplasma species are found on human skin, they can be introduced through poor aseptic technique. Additionally, they can come from contaminated supplements such as fetal bovine serum, and most importantly from other contaminated cell cultures. Once mycoplasma contaminates a culture, it can quickly spread to contaminate other areas of the lab. Strict adherence to good laboratory practices such as good aseptic technique are key, and routine testing for mycoplasma is highly recommended for successful control of mycoplasma contamination. PCR-based detection of mycoplasma has become a very popular method for routine cell line maintenance. PCR-based detection methods are highly sensitive and can provide rapid results, which allows researchers to respond quickly to isolate and eliminate contamination once it is detected in comparison to the time required using microbiological techniques. The LookOut Mycoplasma PCR Detection Kit is highly sensitive, with a detection limit of only 2 genomes per μl. Taking advantage of the highly specific JumpStart Taq DNA Polymerase and a proprietary primer design, false positives are greatly reduced. The convenient 8-tube format, strips pre-coated with dNTPs, and associated primers helps increase the throughput to meet the needs of customers with larger collections of cell lines. Given the extreme sensitivity of the kit, great care must be taken to prevent inadvertent contamination of samples and reagents. The step-by-step protocol we demonstrate highlights the precautions and practices required for reliable mycoplasma detection. We also show and discuss typical results and their interpretation. Our goal is to ensure the success of researchers using the LookOut Mycoplasma PCR Detection Kit.

Citing Articles

Combination immunotherapy including OncoVEX creates a favorable tumor immune micro-environment in transgenic BRAF murine melanoma.

Gartrell R, Blake Z, Rizk E, Perez-Lorenzo R, Weisberg S, Simoes I Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022; 71(8):1837-1849.

PMID: 34999916 PMC: 10991384. DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-03088-y.


Authentication of Primary Murine Cell Lines by a Microfluidics-Based Lab-On-Chip System.

Hong Y, Singh N, Bamopoulos S, Gjerga E, Schmalbrock L, Balabanian K Biomedicines. 2020; 8(12).

PMID: 33317212 PMC: 7763653. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8120590.


Non-Viral in Vitro Gene Delivery: It is Now Time to Set the Bar!.

Bono N, Ponti F, Mantovani D, Candiani G Pharmaceutics. 2020; 12(2).

PMID: 32098191 PMC: 7076396. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020183.


L-WRN conditioned medium for gastrointestinal epithelial stem cell culture shows replicable batch-to-batch activity levels across multiple research teams.

VanDussen K, Sonnek N, Stappenbeck T Stem Cell Res. 2019; 37:101430.

PMID: 30933720 PMC: 6579736. DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101430.


Metabolic profile and differentiation potential of extraembryonic endoderm-like cells.

Gatie M, Kelly G Cell Death Discov. 2018; 4:42.

PMID: 30302276 PMC: 6158286. DOI: 10.1038/s41420-018-0102-1.


References
1.
Kong H, Volokhov D, George J, Ikonomi P, Chandler D, Anderson C . Application of cell culture enrichment for improving the sensitivity of mycoplasma detection methods based on nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007; 77(1):223-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-007-1135-1. View

2.
Volokhov D, Graham L, Brorson K, Chizhikov V . Mycoplasma testing of cell substrates and biologics: Review of alternative non-microbiological techniques. Mol Cell Probes. 2011; 25(2-3):69-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2011.01.002. View

3.
Hopert A, Uphoff C, Wirth M, Hauser H, Drexler H . Specificity and sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in comparison with other methods for the detection of mycoplasma contamination in cell lines. J Immunol Methods. 1993; 164(1):91-100. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(93)90279-g. View