» Articles » PMID: 21707134

Predictors of Response to an Attention Modification Program in Generalized Social Phobia

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2011 Jun 29
PMID 21707134
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: At least 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies have supported the efficacy of computerized attention modification programs (AMPs) in reducing symptoms of anxiety in patients diagnosed with an anxiety disorder. In this study we examined patient characteristics that predicted response to AMP in a large sample of individuals diagnosed with generalized social phobia.

Method: The sample comprised 112 individuals seeking treatment for generalized social phobia who completed a randomized clinical trial comparing AMP (n = 55) with a placebo condition (i.e., attention control condition; n = 57). We examined the following domains of baseline predictors of treatment response: (a) demographic characteristics (gender, age, ethnicity, years of education); (b) clinical characteristics (Axis I comorbidity, trait anxiety, depression); and (c) cognitive disturbance factors (attentional bias for social threat, social interpretation bias).

Results: Results revealed that ethnicity predicted treatment response across both conditions: Participants who self-identified as non-Caucasian displayed better overall response than did Caucasians. The only prescriptive variable to emerge was attentional bias for social threat at preassessment. Participants in the AMP group who exhibited larger attentional bias scores displayed significantly greater reductions in clinician-rated social anxiety symptoms than did their counterparts in the attention control condition.

Conclusions: These results suggest that AMP may be targeted to individuals most likely to benefit from these programs.

Citing Articles

Attentional bias modification and attention control training in PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang F, Huang C, Yan W, Ouyang H, Liu W Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2024; 14:20451253241243260.

PMID: 38633357 PMC: 11022678. DOI: 10.1177/20451253241243260.


"Unpacking" cultural differences in social anxiety between Japanese and European Americans: the roles of threat appraisal and attentional bias.

Krieg A, Xu Y Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1132918.

PMID: 37736154 PMC: 10509556. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132918.


A Novel Cognitive Training Program Targets Stimulus-Driven Attention to Alter Symptoms, Behavior, and Neural Circuitry in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: Pilot Clinical Trial.

Drysdale A, Myers M, Harper J, Guard M, Manhart M, Yu Q J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2023; 33(8):306-315.

PMID: 37669021 PMC: 10616944. DOI: 10.1089/cap.2023.0020.


Positive affect treatment targets reward sensitivity: A randomized controlled trial.

Craske M, Meuret A, Echiverri-Cohen A, Rosenfield D, Ritz T J Consult Clin Psychol. 2023; 91(6):350-366.

PMID: 36892884 PMC: 10213148. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000805.


The questionable validity of attention bias variability: Evidence from two conceptually unrelated cognitive tasks.

Carlson J, Fang L, Kassel D J Affect Disord Rep. 2023; 10.

PMID: 36684713 PMC: 9851093. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100411.


References
1.
Amir N, Weber G, Beard C, Bomyea J, Taylor C . The effect of a single-session attention modification program on response to a public-speaking challenge in socially anxious individuals. J Abnorm Psychol. 2008; 117(4):860-868. PMC: 3569035. DOI: 10.1037/a0013445. View

2.
Smits J, Rosenfield D, McDonald R, Telch M . Cognitive mechanisms of social anxiety reduction: an examination of specificity and temporality. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006; 74(6):1203-12. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1203. View

3.
Heimberg R, Liebowitz M, Hope D, Schneier F, HOLT C, Welkowitz L . Cognitive behavioral group therapy vs phenelzine therapy for social phobia: 12-week outcome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998; 55(12):1133-41. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.12.1133. View

4.
Kazdin A . Evidence-based treatment and practice: new opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. Am Psychol. 2008; 63(3):146-59. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.146. View

5.
Macleod C, Rutherford E, Campbell L, Ebsworthy G, Holker L . Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002; 111(1):107-23. View