» Articles » PMID: 21703289

Pontine and Thalamic Influences on Fluid Rewards: III. Anticipatory Contrast for Sucrose and Corn Oil

Overview
Journal Physiol Behav
Date 2011 Jun 28
PMID 21703289
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An anticipatory contrast effect (ACE) occurs when, across daily trials, an animal comes to respond less than normally to a first stimulus when it is followed shortly by a second, more preferred solution. Classically, ACE is studied using a low (L) concentration of saccharin or sucrose, followed by access to a higher (H) concentration of sucrose. Subjects in the control condition have two bouts of access to the weaker solution presented on the same schedule. The ACE is measured by the difference in intake of the first bout low solution between subjects in the low-low (L-L) vs. the low-high (L-H) conditions. Here we used this paradigm with sham feeding rats and determined that nutritional feedback was unnecessary for the development of ACE with two concentrations of sucrose or with two concentrations of corn oil. Next we showed that ibotenic acid lesions centered in the orosensory thalamus spared ACEs for both sucrose and corn oil. In contrast, lesions of the pontine parabrachial nuclei (PBN), the second central relay for taste in the rat, disrupted ACEs for both sucrose and corn oil. Although the sensory modalities needed for the oral detection of fats remain controversial, it appears that the PBN is involved in processing the comparison of disparate concentrations of sucrose and oil reward.

Citing Articles

Satb2 neurons in the parabrachial nucleus mediate taste perception.

Jarvie B, Chen J, King H, Palmiter R Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):224.

PMID: 33431851 PMC: 7801645. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20100-8.


Striatal Activity and Reward Relativity: Neural Signals Encoding Dynamic Outcome Valuation.

Webber E, Mankin D, Cromwell H eNeuro. 2016; 3(5).

PMID: 27822506 PMC: 5089537. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0022-16.2016.


Drug-motivated behavior in rats with lesions of the thalamic orosensory area.

Nyland J, Alexander D, Grigson P Behav Neurosci. 2015; 130(1):103-13.

PMID: 26653714 PMC: 6148348. DOI: 10.1037/bne0000114.


Relative reward effects on operant behavior: Incentive contrast, induction and variety effects.

Webber E, Chambers N, Kostek J, Mankin D, Cromwell H Behav Processes. 2015; 116:87-99.

PMID: 25979604 PMC: 4458168. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.05.003.


Conditioned Aversion for a Cocaine-Predictive Cue is Associated with Cocaine Seeking and Taking in Rats.

Colechio E, Grigson P Int J Comp Psychol. 2015; 27(3):488-500.

PMID: 25673916 PMC: 4321739.


References
1.
Lucas G, Timberlake W . Negative anticipatory contrast and preference conditioning: flavor cues support preference conditioning, and environmental cues support contrast. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992; 18(1):34-40. DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.18.1.34. View

2.
Sclafani A, Nissenbaum J . Is gastric sham feeding really sham feeding?. Am J Physiol. 1985; 248(3 Pt 2):R387-90. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1985.248.3.R387. View

3.
Weatherford S, Greenberg D, Gibbs J, Smith G . The potency of D-1 and D-2 receptor antagonists is inversely related to the reward value of sham-fed corn oil and sucrose in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990; 37(2):317-23. DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90341-e. View

4.
Liang N, Freet C, Grigson P, Norgren R . Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: I. Operant responding for sucrose and corn oil. Physiol Behav. 2011; 105(2):576-88. PMC: 3207032. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.010. View

5.
Kosar E, Grill H, Norgren R . Gustatory cortex in the rat. II. Thalamocortical projections. Brain Res. 1986; 379(2):342-52. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90788-2. View