» Articles » PMID: 21699568

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Endoprostheses in the Treatment of Large or Multiple Common Bile Duct Stones

Overview
Journal Dig Endosc
Date 2011 Jun 25
PMID 21699568
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aim: Little information is available on the outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy plus biliary stent placement without stone extraction as primary therapy at initial endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of large or multiple common bile duct (CBD) stones. The aim of the present study was to study the effect of biliary stents and sphincterotomy as primary therapy for patients with choledocholithiasis.

Methods: Patients with large (≥20 mm) or multiple (≥3) CBD stones were retrospectively studied. The patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy and placement of plastic stents in the bile duct without stone extraction at the initial ERCP. Three or more months later, a second ERCP was carried out and stone removal was attempted. Differences in stone size and the largest CBD diameter before and after stenting were compared. Stone clearance and complications were also evaluated.

Results: 52 patients were enrolled. After a median of 124 days of biliary plastic stent placement the mean maximal stone diameter decreased from 16.6 mm to 10.0 mm (P < 0.01). The mean CBD diameter also decreased from 15.3 mm to 11.5 mm (P < 0.01). The total stone clearance at second ERCP was 94.2%, only 5.7% of which needed mechanical lithotripsy.

Complications: pancreatitis in one (1.9%) at initial ERCP, cholangitis in two (3.8%) after 52 days and 84 days of placement of stent. No complications were recorded at second ERCP.

Conclusions: Biliary plastic stents plus endoscopic sphincterotomy without stone extraction as primary therapy at initial ERCP is a safe and effective method in the management of large or multiple CBD stones.

Citing Articles

Outcome of forgotten biliary stents for more than five years-A two-decade experience.

Sharma S, Maharshi S, Sapra B, Nijhawan S, Sharma D Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024; 43(4):768-774.

PMID: 38206449 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01493-y.


Characteristics and metabolic potential of biliary microbiota in patients with giant common bile duct stones.

Dai C, Xu C, Zheng L, Wang M, Fan Z, Ye J Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023; 13:1259761.

PMID: 38029241 PMC: 10661410. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1259761.


Large common bile duct stones in high-risk elderly patients: Immediate endoscopic stone removal or elective stone removal? A single-center retrospective study.

Meng K, Zhang D, Chen D, Liu W, Fang K, Chen S BMC Gastroenterol. 2023; 23(1):344.

PMID: 37798726 PMC: 10552253. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02976-0.


Endoscopic luminal stenting: Current applications and future perspectives.

Moutzoukis M, Argyriou K, Kapsoritakis A, Christodoulou D World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023; 15(4):195-215.

PMID: 37138934 PMC: 10150289. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i4.195.


Difficult Biliary Stones: A Comprehensive Review of New and Old Lithotripsy Techniques.

Troncone E, Mossa M, De Vico P, Monteleone G, Del Vecchio Blanco G Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(1).

PMID: 35056428 PMC: 8779004. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58010120.