» Articles » PMID: 21694565

Faculty Career Tracks at U.S. Medical Schools

Overview
Journal Acad Med
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2011 Jun 23
PMID 21694565
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To describe faculty career tracks at U.S. MD-granting schools and explore which institutional characteristics are associated with the career tracks.

Method: Between 2008 and 2009, the authors sought the faculty policies of 129 accredited MD-granting U.S. medical schools, through online searching and requests to faculty affairs representatives. An inventory of tenured and nontenured career tracks was conducted in the areas of teaching, research, and clinical care. Career track data were analyzed according to institutional characteristics.

Results: Complete data were collected from 98 schools (76%). On average, schools offered 3.6 career tracks to all faculty (range 1-8). Of the 353 career tracks identified, 210 were nontenured. Overall, schools offered more research tracks than education or clinical tracks. Of the 79 schools with clearly defined career tracks, 78 offered at least one clinical track; 34 offered at least one education track. Approximately 25% of the clinical tracks were tenured; 41% of the education tracks were tenured. Of the 98 schools, 61% used modified titles for faculty pursuing nontenure tracks. Schools that offered more career tracks were more likely to use modified titles for their nontenured clinical and research faculty. Schools with a smaller faculty size offered a greater number of clinical tracks, whereas community-based schools offered fewer clinical tracks. Research-intensive schools provided significantly more tenured clinical tracks.

Conclusions: There is great variation in faculty tracks and policies across institutions. This research may help institutions craft their own faculty policies and help students, residents, and faculty in making career decisions.

Citing Articles

Educator's blueprint: A guide for clinician-educators to achieve promotion in emergency medicine.

Gore K, Dyne P, Fitch M, Mattu A, Pillow M, Gottlieb M AEM Educ Train. 2023; 7(3):e10883.

PMID: 37261218 PMC: 10227173. DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10883.


Assessing the pediatric subspecialty pipeline: it is all about the data source.

Freed G, Wickham K Pediatr Res. 2022; 93(7):1907-1912.

PMID: 36564480 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-022-02438-5.


Mission Critical: Reimagining Promotion for Clinician-Educators.

Chang A, Karani R, Dhaliwal G J Gen Intern Med. 2022; 38(3):789-792.

PMID: 36456843 PMC: 9971380. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07969-5.


How We Review a Medical Education Research Manuscript.

Hayes M, Fessler H ATS Sch. 2022; 3(1):38-47.

PMID: 35633998 PMC: 9131887. DOI: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2021-0105PS.


Attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to recognizing and rewarding clinician teachers' performances and achievements: a narrative review.

Fantaye A, Kitto S, Hendry P, Wiesenfeld L, Whiting S, Gnyra C Can Med Educ J. 2022; 13(2):57-72.

PMID: 35572019 PMC: 9099178. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.73241.