» Articles » PMID: 21691915

Multinomial Logistic Functions in Markov Chain Models of Sleep Architecture: Internal and External Validation and Covariate Analysis

Overview
Journal AAPS J
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2011 Jun 22
PMID 21691915
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mixed-effect Markov chain models have been recently proposed to characterize the time course of transition probabilities between sleep stages in insomniac patients. The most recent one, based on multinomial logistic functions, was used as a base to develop a final model combining the strengths of the existing ones. This final model was validated on placebo data applying also new diagnostic methods and then used for the inclusion of potential age, gender, and BMI effects. Internal validation was performed through simplified posterior predictive check (sPPC), visual predictive check (VPC) for categorical data, and new visual methods based on stochastic simulation and estimation and called visual estimation check (VEC). External validation mainly relied on the evaluation of the objective function value and sPPC. Covariate effects were identified through stepwise covariate modeling within NONMEM VI. New model features were introduced in the model, providing significant sPPC improvements. Outcomes from VPC, VEC, and external validation were generally very good. Age, gender, and BMI were found to be statistically significant covariates, but their inclusion did not improve substantially the model's predictive performance. In summary, an improved model for sleep internal architecture has been developed and suitably validated in insomniac patients treated with placebo. Thereafter, covariate effects have been included into the final model.

Citing Articles

Psychosocial Stressors, Depression, and Physical Activity among African Americans.

Wu I, Strong L, Nguyen N, Cho D, John J, McNeill L Am J Health Behav. 2019; 43(4):717-728.

PMID: 31239015 PMC: 10486259. DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.43.4.6.


Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer patients. A population pharmacodynamic modeling.

Martin-Romano P, P Solans B, Cano D, Subtil J, Chopitea A, Arbea L PLoS One. 2019; 14(5):e0215970.

PMID: 31071108 PMC: 6508715. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215970.


Translation Between Two Models; Application with Integrated Glucose Homeostasis Models.

Ibrahim M, Largajolli A, Kjellsson M, Karlsson M Pharm Res. 2019; 36(6):86.

PMID: 31001701 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-019-2592-9.


Incorporation of stochastic variability in mechanistic population pharmacokinetic models: handling the physiological constraints using normal transformations.

Tsamandouras N, Wendling T, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Galetin A, Aarons L J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2015; 42(4):349-73.

PMID: 26006250 DOI: 10.1007/s10928-015-9418-0.


Optimal clinical trial design based on a dichotomous Markov-chain mixed-effect sleep model.

Ernest 2nd C, Nyberg J, Karlsson M, Hooker A J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2014; 41(6):639-54.

PMID: 25308776 DOI: 10.1007/s10928-014-9391-z.


References
1.
Redline S, Kirchner H, Quan S, Gottlieb D, Kapur V, Newman A . The effects of age, sex, ethnicity, and sleep-disordered breathing on sleep architecture. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164(4):406-18. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.4.406. View

2.
Van Cauter E, Knutson K . Sleep and the epidemic of obesity in children and adults. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008; 159 Suppl 1:S59-66. PMC: 2755992. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0298. View

3.
Rao M, Blackwell T, Redline S, Stefanick M, Ancoli-Israel S, Stone K . Association between sleep architecture and measures of body composition. Sleep. 2009; 32(4):483-90. PMC: 2663862. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/32.4.483. View

4.
Karlsson M, Schoemaker R, Kemp B, Cohen A, van Gerven J, Tuk B . A pharmacodynamic Markov mixed-effects model for the effect of temazepam on sleep. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000; 68(2):175-88. DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2000.108669. View

5.
Ribbing J, Jonsson E . Power, selection bias and predictive performance of the Population Pharmacokinetic Covariate Model. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2004; 31(2):109-34. DOI: 10.1023/b:jopa.0000034404.86036.72. View