» Articles » PMID: 21689778

Phylogenetic Constraints on Digesta Separation: Variation in Fluid Throughput in the Digestive Tract in Mammalian Herbivores

Overview
Date 2011 Jun 22
PMID 21689778
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The relevance of the mean retention time (MRT) of particles through the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is well understood and MRT(particle)GIT is an important parameter in digestion models. Solute markers have been used to estimate MRT(solute)GIT (or 'fluid passage') in animals, but the relevance of this measure is less evident and is usually sought in its relation to MRT(particle)GIT. The ratio between the two measures indicates the degree of 'digesta washing', with little washing occurring at ratios of 1, aborad washing at ratios >1 (where the solute marker travels faster than the particle marker), and orad (retrograde) washing at ratios <1 (where the solute marker travels slower than the particle marker). We analysed digesta washing in a dataset of 98 mammalian species including man of different digestion types (caecum, colon and nonruminant foregut fermenters, and ruminants), controlling for phylogeny; a subset of 72 species allowed testing for the influence of food intake level. The results indicate that MRT(solute)GIT and the degree of digesta washing are related to digestion type, whereas variation in MRT(particle)GIT is influenced mainly by effects of body mass and food intake. Thus, fluid throughput and digesta washing emerge as important correlates of digestive anatomy. Most importantly, primates appear constrained to little digesta washing compared to non-primate mammalian herbivores, regardless of their digestion type. These results may help explain the absence of primates from certain herbivore niches and represent a drastic example of a physiologic limitation in a phylogenetic group. More experimental research is required to illuminate relative benefits and costs of digesta washing.

Citing Articles

Teeth and the gastrointestinal tract in mammals: when 1 + 1 = 3.

Clauss M, Fritz J, Hummel J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1891):20220544.

PMID: 37839451 PMC: 10577037. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0544.


No size-dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses.

Schwarm A, Clauss M, Ortmann S, Jensen R J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2022; 106(6):1356-1363.

PMID: 35894118 PMC: 9796864. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13757.


No news from old drawings? Stomach anatomy in muroid rodents in relation to body size and ecology.

Steiner N, Clauss M, Martin L, Imper C, Meloro C, Duque-Correa M J Morphol. 2022; 283(9):1200-1209.

PMID: 35830587 PMC: 9543737. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.21496.


Increasing food intake affects digesta retention, digestibility and gut fill but not chewing efficiency in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

Findeisen E, Sudekum K, Fritz J, Hummel J, Clauss M J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol. 2021; 335(7):614-622.

PMID: 34254468 PMC: 8362112. DOI: 10.1002/jez.2505.


Body weight and sex effects on digesta mean retention time in growing Saanen goats.

Gindri M, Leite R, Harter C, da Silva S, St-Pierre N, Fernandes M Transl Anim Sci. 2020; 4(2):txaa028.

PMID: 32705026 PMC: 7284118. DOI: 10.1093/tas/txaa028.