» Articles » PMID: 21687793

Differential Contribution of Right and Left Temporo-occipital and Anterior Temporal Lesions to Face Recognition Disorders

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2011 Jun 21
PMID 21687793
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the study of prosopagnosia, several issues (such as the specific or non-specific manifestations of prosopagnosia, the unitary or non-unitary nature of this syndrome and the mechanisms underlying face recognition disorders) are still controversial. Two main sources of variance partially accounting for these controversies could be the qualitative differences between the face recognition disorders observed in patients with prevalent lesions of the right or left hemisphere and in those with lesions encroaching upon the temporo-occipital (TO) or the (right) anterior temporal cortex. Results of our review seem to confirm these suggestions. Indeed, they show that (a) the most specific forms of prosopagnosia are due to lesions of a right posterior network including the occipital face area and the fusiform face area, whereas (b) the face identification defects observed in patients with left TO lesions seem due to a semantic defect impeding access to person-specific semantic information from the visual modality. Furthermore, face recognition defects resulting from right anterior temporal lesions can usually be considered as part of a multimodal people recognition disorder. The implications of our review are, therefore, the following: (1) to consider the components of visual agnosia often observed in prosopagnosic patients with bilateral TO lesions as part of a semantic defect, resulting from left-sided lesions (and not from prosopagnosia proper); (2) to systematically investigate voice recognition disorders in patients with right anterior temporal lesions to determine whether the face recognition defect should be considered a form of "associative prosopagnosia" or a form of the "multimodal people recognition disorder."

Citing Articles

Cross-sectional and longitudinal changes in category-selectivity in visual cortex following pediatric cortical resection.

Liu T, Granovetter M, Maallo A, Robert S, Fu J, Patterson C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39713452 PMC: 11661110. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.08.627367.


Brain-consistent architecture for imagination.

Yamakawa H, Fukawa A, Yairi I, Matsuo Y Front Syst Neurosci. 2024; 18:1302429.

PMID: 39229305 PMC: 11368743. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2024.1302429.


Human Recognition: The Utilization of Face, Voice, Name and Interactions-An Extended Editorial.

Gainotti G Brain Sci. 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38671996 PMC: 11048321. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14040345.


Emergence of number sense through the integration of multimodal information: developmental learning insights from neural network models.

Noda K, Soda T, Yamashita Y Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1330512.

PMID: 38298912 PMC: 10828047. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1330512.


Literacy acquisition facilitates inversion effects for faces with full-, low-, and high-spatial frequency: evidence from illiterate and literate adults.

Yang Q, Zhang L, Chen C, Cao X Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1061232.

PMID: 37168431 PMC: 10164973. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061232.


References
1.
Rhodes G, Brake S, Atkinson A . What's lost in inverted faces?. Cognition. 1993; 47(1):25-57. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90061-y. View

2.
Farah M, Levinson K, Klein K . Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia. 1995; 33(6):661-74. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00002-k. View

3.
Gainotti G . Not all patients labeled as "prosopagnosia" have a real prosopagnosia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010; 32(7):763-6. DOI: 10.1080/13803390903512686. View

4.
Feinberg T, Schindler R, Ochoa E, Kwan P, Farah M . Associative visual agnosia and alexia without prosopagnosia. Cortex. 1994; 30(3):395-411. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80337-1. View

5.
Delvenne J, Seron X, Coyette F, Rossion B . Evidence for perceptual deficits in associative visual (prosop)agnosia: a single-case study. Neuropsychologia. 2004; 42(5):597-612. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10.008. View