» Articles » PMID: 21680168

Reconciling Incongruous Qualitative and Quantitative Findings in Mixed Methods Research: Exemplars from Research with Drug Using Populations

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2011 Jun 18
PMID 21680168
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mixed methods research is increasingly being promoted in the health sciences as a way to gain more comprehensive understandings of how social processes and individual behaviours shape human health. Mixed methods research most commonly combines qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis strategies. Often, integrating findings from multiple methods is assumed to confirm or validate the findings from one method with the findings from another, seeking convergence or agreement between methods. Cases in which findings from different methods are congruous are generally thought of as ideal, whilst conflicting findings may, at first glance, appear problematic. However, the latter situation provides the opportunity for a process through which apparently discordant results are reconciled, potentially leading to new emergent understandings of complex social phenomena. This paper presents three case studies drawn from the authors' research on HIV risk amongst injection drug users in which mixed methods studies yielded apparently discrepant results. We use these case studies (involving injection drug users [IDUs] using a Needle/Syringe Exchange Program in Los Angeles, CA, USA; IDUs seeking to purchase needle/syringes at pharmacies in Tijuana, Mexico; and young street-based IDUs in San Francisco, CA, USA) to identify challenges associated with integrating findings from mixed methods projects, summarize lessons learned, and make recommendations for how to more successfully anticipate and manage the integration of findings. Despite the challenges inherent in reconciling apparently conflicting findings from qualitative and quantitative approaches, in keeping with others who have argued in favour of integrating mixed methods findings, we contend that such an undertaking has the potential to yield benefits that emerge only through the struggle to reconcile discrepant results and may provide a sum that is greater than the individual qualitative and quantitative parts.

Citing Articles

Companion animal adoption and relinquishment during the COVID-19 pandemic: The experiences of animal rescue staff and volunteers.

Carroll G, Reeve C, Torjussen A Anim Welf. 2024; 33:e12.

PMID: 38510425 PMC: 10951665. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.15.


Day to Day and Environmental Risk Factors for Psychological Distress Among Healthcare Workers: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

Atkins K, Cooney E, Park S, Closser S, Surkan P, Marker H J Occup Environ Med. 2023; 65(9):e593-e603.

PMID: 37367694 PMC: 11299763. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002909.


Creating safe spaces to prevent unintentional childhood injuries among the Bedouins in southern Israel: A hybrid model comprising positive deviance, community-based participatory research, and entertainment-education.

Gesser-Edelsburg A, Alamour Y, Cohen R, Abed Elhadi Shahbari N, Hijazi R, Orr D PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0257696.

PMID: 34551005 PMC: 8457499. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257696.


When Politics Meets Pandemic: How Prime Minister Netanyahu and a Small Team Communicated Health and Risk Information to the Israeli Public During the Early Stages of COVID-19.

Gesser-Edelsburg A, Hijazi R Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020; 13:2985-3002.

PMID: 33363422 PMC: 7754254. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S280952.


The effect of two types of minimal acupuncture on stooling, sleeping and feeding in infants with colic: secondary analysis of a multicentre RCT in Sweden (ACU-COL).

Landgren K, Hallstrom I, Tiberg I Acupunct Med. 2020; 39(2):106-115.

PMID: 32375501 PMC: 7961620. DOI: 10.1177/0964528420920308.


References
1.
Strathdee S, Fraga W, Case P, Firestone M, Brouwer K, Perez S . "Vivo para consumirla y la consumo para vivir" ["I live to inject and inject to live"]: high-risk injection behaviors in Tijuana, Mexico. J Urban Health. 2005; 82(3 Suppl 4):iv58-73. PMC: 2196210. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/jti108. View

2.
Pollini R, Lozada R, Gallardo M, Rosen P, Vera A, Macias A . Barriers to pharmacy-based syringe purchase among injection drug users in Tijuana, Mexico: a mixed methods study. AIDS Behav. 2010; 14(3):679-87. PMC: 2865643. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-010-9674-3. View

3.
Clatts M, Davis W, Atillasoy A . Hitting a moving target: the use of ethnographic methods in the development of sampling strategies for the evaluation of AIDS outreach programs for homeless youth in New York City. NIDA Res Monogr. 1995; 157:117-35. View

4.
Wagner K, Lankenau S, Palinkas L, Richardson J, Chou C, Unger J . The influence of the perceived consequences of refusing to share injection equipment among injection drug users: balancing competing risks. Addict Behav. 2011; 36(8):835-42. PMC: 3098341. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.03.014. View

5.
Gostin L . The legal environment impeding access to sterile syringes and needles: the conflict between law enforcement and public health. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998; 18 Suppl 1:S60-70. DOI: 10.1097/00042560-199802001-00012. View