» Articles » PMID: 21679992

New N Staging System of Penile Cancer Provides a Better Reflection of Prognosis

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2011 Jun 18
PMID 21679992
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We determined whether the new N staging system, which was introduced in 2009, leads to more specific prediction of survival in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Materials And Methods: We analyzed the records of 60 patients in whom node positive penile cancer was surgically resected from 1990 to 2008. All cases were staged according the 6th and 7th N staging system after pathological review. Histopathological information on the number of positive lymph nodes, lymph node metastasis laterality, extranodal extension, pelvic lymph node metastasis and lymph node ratio were also recorded. We evaluated the added information on these nodal related prognostic factors to the current N classification. Recurrence-free survival was calculated. Predictive accuracy was assessed by the concordance index.

Results: Disease recurred in 27 of the 60 patients (42.4%) at a median of 10 months. In the 33 patients without recurrence at the last visit median followup was 53 months. Using the 6th N classification the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 69.8%, 48.2% and 33.3% for the N1, N2 and N3 categories, respectively. Log rank survival analysis failed to show a statistical difference (p=0.054). For the new 7th N categories the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 87.5%, 57% and 31.8% in the corresponding N1 to N3 groups. Better survival stratification was observed on analysis (p<0.001). Adding lymph node metastasis laterality or lymph node ratio significantly increased the accuracy of the 7th N category to predict recurrence-free survival.

Conclusions: The new N staging system better reflects the prognosis in patients with penile cancer.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic simultaneous anterograde inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: two planses, three holes, and six steps.

Yi X, Li X, Lu Y, Lu H, Chen Y, Zeng L Front Surg. 2024; 11:1344269.

PMID: 38872725 PMC: 11169933. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1344269.


A laparoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy approach partly preserving great saphenous vein branches can benefit for patients with penile carcinoma.

Ma Y, Hao J, Yin H, Zhu M, Guan B, Zhu C BMC Surg. 2022; 22(1):138.

PMID: 35397549 PMC: 8994377. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01582-3.


Partial penectomy or total penectomy for T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis?.

Zheng Q, Wu Y, Zhang Z, Xu N Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 8(5):1750-1755.

PMID: 35116925 PMC: 8798828. DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2019.08.37.


Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer.

Gao P, Zhu T, Gao J, Li H, Liu X, Zhang X Front Oncol. 2021; 11:706531.

PMID: 34307174 PMC: 8293298. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.706531.


Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Penile Cancer With Inguinal Lymph Node Extranodal Extension: A Multicenter Experience.

Li Z, Han H, Deng C, Li Y, Wu C, Chen P Front Surg. 2021; 8:644273.

PMID: 34211998 PMC: 8239133. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.644273.