» Articles » PMID: 21673746

Opinions and Intentions of Parents of an Autistic Child Toward Genetic Research Results: Two Typical Profiles

Overview
Journal Eur J Hum Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2011 Jun 16
PMID 21673746
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Returning results to research participants is increasingly acknowledged in research ethics guidelines. But few research teams actually do it or provide mechanisms for offering it as an option. We explored the perspective of parents of an autistic child participating in genetic research. In all, 388 questionnaires were sent to 194 parents; 158 questionnaires were completed (89 mothers and 69 fathers), giving a response rate of 41%. 97% of respondents (n=153) fully expressed a strong desire to receive research results, either general or individual ones. The survey solicited parents' opinions as to what means could be put in place to return research results. The majority held the research team responsible for returning individual results (79.7%, n=126). They indicated that it should occur at the completion of the research project (69%, n=109), by mail (75.3%, n=119). Over three quarters felt the Ministry of Health should cover the associated costs (77.8%, n=123). If the communication of individual findings, whether positive or negative, were to be possible, these would allow some respondents 'to be prepared for the future' (37%, n=57), without necessarily having practical benefits (21%, n=32), but at least bringing them 'relief or understanding' (14%, n=21). Moreover, parents were clear about the difference between research and clinical settings. This study underlines the importance of broadening the discussion about the communication of research results, especially individual ones. We believe that the integration of different perspectives--those of researchers, clinicians, ethics committees and participants--will enrich the debate and offer enlightenment for future ethical guidelines.

Citing Articles

Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.

Vears D, Minion J, Roberts S, Cummings J, Machirori M, Blell M PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0258646.

PMID: 34748551 PMC: 8575249. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258646.


Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review.

Vears D, Minion J, Roberts S, Cummings J, Machirori M, Murtagh M Per Med. 2021; 18(3):295-310.

PMID: 33822658 PMC: 8242984. DOI: 10.2217/pme-2020-0139.


Ethical issues in genomics research on neurodevelopmental disorders: a critical interpretive review.

Mezinska S, Gallagher L, Verbrugge M, Bunnik E Hum Genomics. 2021; 15(1):16.

PMID: 33712057 PMC: 7953558. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-021-00317-4.


Preferences for Accessing Electronic Health Records for Research Purposes: Views of Parents Who Have a Child With a Known or Suspected Genetic Condition.

Raspa M, Paquin R, Brown D, Andrews S, Edwards A, Moultrie R Value Health. 2020; 23(12):1639-1652.

PMID: 33248520 PMC: 7701359. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.016.


Why parents consent to their children's participation in genetic research: A study of parental decision making.

Kumari S, Bhatia T, Mishra N, Kumari N, Narayanan S, Malik D Indian J Med Ethics. 2019; 4 (NS)(4).

PMID: 31791933 PMC: 7018624. DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2019.063.


References
1.
Miller F, Giacomini M, Ahern C, Robert J, de Laat S . When research seems like clinical care: a qualitative study of the communication of individual cancer genetic research results. BMC Med Ethics. 2008; 9:4. PMC: 2267198. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-4. View

2.
Clayton E, Friedman Ross L . Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research. JAMA. 2006; 295(1):37. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.1.37-a. View

3.
Bookman E, Langehorne A, Eckfeldt J, Glass K, Jarvik G, Klag M . Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am J Med Genet A. 2006; 140(10):1033-40. PMC: 2556074. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31195. View

4.
Hayeems R, Miller F, Li L, Bytautas J . Not so simple: a quasi-experimental study of how researchers adjudicate genetic research results. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011; 19(7):740-7. PMC: 3137502. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.34. View

5.
Renegar G, Webster C, Stuerzebecher S, Harty L, Ide S, Balkite B . Returning genetic research results to individuals: points-to-consider. Bioethics. 2006; 20(1):24-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00473.x. View