» Articles » PMID: 21656656

Patients' Expectations and Success Criteria for Liver Transplantation

Overview
Journal Liver Transpl
Date 2011 Jun 10
PMID 21656656
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes are important to consider when the relative success of liver transplantation (LT) is being evaluated. Our primary objective was to examine the expectations for LT and the criteria for its success across 4 domains of functioning (pain, fatigue, emotional distress, and interference with daily activities) from the perspective of patients who were wait-listed for LT. One hundred four adult patients with a mean wait-list time of 16.5 ± 13 months completed a semistructured interview with a modified version of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Questionnaire (PCOQ). The patients reported moderate usual levels of pain, fatigue, emotional distress, and interference with daily activities (mean rating range = 3.8-6.2), and they attached great importance to improvements in these domains after LT (mean rating range = 7.3-8.0). Patients considered a mean reduction in pain of 33% to be a successful LT outcome. A reduction in fatigue of 56%, a reduction in emotional distress of 44%, and a reduction in interference with daily activities of 54% represented successful LT across these domains. Patients with more severe illness had higher expectations for fatigue (r = -0.30, P = 0.002) and interference with daily activities (r = -0.24, P = 0.015). Cluster and correlational analyses provided support for the validity of the PCOQ with LT patients. Our findings underscore the importance and value of using patient-centered assessments to better understand the ways in which patients prioritize LT outcomes and define transplantation success. Patient-centered assessments have the potential to facilitate provider-patient communication by helping patients to prioritize their goals for LT and make informed choices on the basis of those priorities.

Citing Articles

European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on Outcome Measures in Liver Transplantation According to Value-Based Health Care.

Carbone M, Neuberger J, Rowe I, Polak W, Forsberg A, Fondevila C Transpl Int. 2024; 36:12190.

PMID: 38332850 PMC: 10850237. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.12190.


Didactical characteristics of Dutch websites about kidney transplantation targeted for kidney patients and living donors: An exploratory study.

van Klaveren C, de Jong P, Hendriks R, Luk F, de Vries A, van der Boog P PEC Innov. 2023; 1:100026.

PMID: 37213764 PMC: 10194093. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100026.


Exploring patients' perceptions and experiences of treatments for the prevention of variceal bleeding: a qualitative study.

Poyner C, Tripathi D, Mathers J BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021; 8(1).

PMID: 34400438 PMC: 8370546. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000684.


Comparison of results on the use of extended criteria liver doners for transplants in Espírito Santo.

Lugon Ferreira-Jr A, Miguel G, Moscon I, Abreu I, Aguiar J, Vecci T Rev Col Bras Cir. 2021; 48:e20202492.

PMID: 33978120 PMC: 10683471. DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202492.


Measurement of patients' acceptable symptom levels and priorities for symptom improvement in advanced lung cancer.

Krueger E, Secinti E, Wu W, Hanna N, Durm G, Einhorn L Support Care Cancer. 2021; 29(10):5895-5904.

PMID: 33763726 PMC: 8503908. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06159-z.