» Articles » PMID: 21656196

Implant Survival and Outcome After Rotating-hinge Total Knee Revision Arthroplasty: a Minimum 6-year Follow-up

Overview
Date 2011 Jun 10
PMID 21656196
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Data on long-time survival and clinical function of rotating hinge knee prostheses used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are scarce.

Method: We evaluate the outcome of 42 revision TKA in 38 patients using the Endo-model rotating hinge total knee prosthesis after a minimum of 6 years, with 10-year implant survival as our primary outcome measure. Only revision TKAs performed due to aseptic loosening were included, and the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register was consulted in order to ensure that patients unavailable for clinical follow-up had not been revised elsewhere. Mean follow-up was after 8.8 (6-18) years, mean age at revision surgery was 72 (55-88) years, and most patients had severe medical comorbidities (n = 31).

Results: At follow-up, four knees had been re-revised due to aseptic loosening, and five further knees underwent re-revision due to other reasons. With implant revision due to aseptic loosening as the endpoint, 10-year survival was 89.2%, and with implant revision due to any reason 10-year survival was 65.1%. 11 patients (13 knees) eligible for clinical follow-up were evaluated according to the Hospital for Special Surgery score (HSSS), the Knee Society scores (KSS), and by plain radiography. Mean HSSS was 67 (36-90), mean KSS-knee was 85 (73-96), and mean KSS-function was 29 (0-100). Radiography showed that no implant was in need of revision.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that revision arthroplasty of the knee with this rotating hinge prosthesis can be performed with satisfactory or good results in an elderly population with severe comorbidities.

Citing Articles

Rotating Hinge Knee Arthroplasty for Charcot Joints of the Knees in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: A Report of Two Cases.

Ehara Y, Nakano N, Takayama K, Kuroda Y, Hashimoto S, Hayashi S Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63154.

PMID: 39070426 PMC: 11272421. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63154.


Aseptic midterm survival rates between different cemented tibial stem designs in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a 6-year evaluation from the German Arthroplasty Registry.

Maslaris A, Grimberg A, Melsheimer O, Tsiridis E, Matziolis G Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(5):2283-2295.

PMID: 38625551 PMC: 11093826. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05273-x.


Condylar constrained and rotating hinged implants in revision knee arthroplasty show similar survivorship and clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Stroobant L, de Taeye T, Byttebier P, Van Onsem S, Jacobs E, Burssens A Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(12):5365-5380.

PMID: 37747534 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07572-z.


Constraint degree in revision total knee replacement: a registry study on 1432 patients.

Digennaro V, Brunello M, Di Martino A, Panciera A, Bordini B, Bulzacki Bogucki B Musculoskelet Surg. 2023; 108(2):195-200.

PMID: 37237144 PMC: 11133104. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-023-00790-1.


Indications, clinical outcome and survival of rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in a retrospective study of 63 primary and revision cases.

Hecker A, Putz H, Wangler S, Eberlein S, Klenke F Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022; 33(5):1885-1894.

PMID: 35989369 PMC: 10276093. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03349-1.