» Articles » PMID: 21647308

Using Web Search Query Data to Monitor Dengue Epidemics: a New Model for Neglected Tropical Disease Surveillance

Overview
Date 2011 Jun 8
PMID 21647308
Citations 120
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A variety of obstacles including bureaucracy and lack of resources have interfered with timely detection and reporting of dengue cases in many endemic countries. Surveillance efforts have turned to modern data sources, such as Internet search queries, which have been shown to be effective for monitoring influenza-like illnesses. However, few have evaluated the utility of web search query data for other diseases, especially those of high morbidity and mortality or where a vaccine may not exist. In this study, we aimed to assess whether web search queries are a viable data source for the early detection and monitoring of dengue epidemics.

Methodology/principal Findings: Bolivia, Brazil, India, Indonesia and Singapore were chosen for analysis based on available data and adequate search volume. For each country, a univariate linear model was then built by fitting a time series of the fraction of Google search query volume for specific dengue-related queries from that country against a time series of official dengue case counts for a time-frame within 2003-2010. The specific combination of queries used was chosen to maximize model fit. Spurious spikes in the data were also removed prior to model fitting. The final models, fit using a training subset of the data, were cross-validated against both the overall dataset and a holdout subset of the data. All models were found to fit the data quite well, with validation correlations ranging from 0.82 to 0.99.

Conclusions/significance: Web search query data were found to be capable of tracking dengue activity in Bolivia, Brazil, India, Indonesia and Singapore. Whereas traditional dengue data from official sources are often not available until after some substantial delay, web search query data are available in near real-time. These data represent valuable complement to assist with traditional dengue surveillance.

Citing Articles

Incorporating connectivity among Internet search data for enhanced influenza-like illness tracking.

Ning S, Hussain A, Wang Q PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0305579.

PMID: 39186560 PMC: 11346739. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305579.


COVIDHealth: A novel labeled dataset and machine learning-based web application for classifying COVID-19 discourses on Twitter.

Bishal M, Chowdory M, Das A, Kabir M Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34103.

PMID: 39100452 PMC: 11295851. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34103.


A Bayesian System to Detect and Track Outbreaks of Influenza-Like Illnesses Including Novel Diseases: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Aronis J, Ye Y, Espino J, Hochheiser H, Michaels M, Cooper G JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10:e57349.

PMID: 38805611 PMC: 11350309. DOI: 10.2196/57349.


Detecting Elevated Air Pollution Levels by Monitoring Web Search Queries: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Lin C, Yousefi S, Kahoro E, Karisani P, Liang D, Sarnat J JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(12):e23422.

PMID: 36534457 PMC: 9808603. DOI: 10.2196/23422.


State-Level COVID-19 Symptom Searches and Case Data: Quantitative Analysis of Political Affiliation as a Predictor for Lag Time Using Google Trends and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Data.

Turvy A JMIR Form Res. 2022; 6(12):e40825.

PMID: 36446048 PMC: 9822176. DOI: 10.2196/40825.


References
1.
Camacho T, Hoz F, Cardenas V, Sanchez C, de Calderon L, Perez L . Incomplete surveillance of a dengue-2 epidemic in Ibagué, Colombia, 1995-1997. Biomedica. 2004; 24(2):174-82. View

2.
Runge-Ranzinger S, Horstick O, Marx M, Kroeger A . What does dengue disease surveillance contribute to predicting and detecting outbreaks and describing trends?. Trop Med Int Health. 2008; 13(8):1022-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02112.x. View

3.
Gomez-Dantes H, Willoquet J . Dengue in the Americas: challenges for prevention and control. Cad Saude Publica. 2009; 25 Suppl 1:S19-31. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009001300003. View

4.
Chahar H, Bharaj P, Dar L, Guleria R, Kabra S, Broor S . Co-infections with chikungunya virus and dengue virus in Delhi, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009; 15(7):1077-80. PMC: 2744227. DOI: 10.3201/eid1507.080638. View

5.
Polgreen P, Chen Y, Pennock D, Nelson F . Using internet searches for influenza surveillance. Clin Infect Dis. 2008; 47(11):1443-8. DOI: 10.1086/593098. View