» Articles » PMID: 21639888

Client Preferences and Acceptability for Medical Abortion and MVA As Early Pregnancy Termination Method in Northwest Ethiopia

Overview
Journal Reprod Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2011 Jun 7
PMID 21639888
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Increasing access to safe abortion services is the most effective way of preventing the burden of unsafe abortion, which is achieved by increasing safe choices for pregnancy termination. Medical abortion for termination of early abortion is said to safe, effective, and acceptable to women in several countries. In Ethiopia, however, medical methods have, until recently, never been used. For this reason it is important to assess women's preferences and the acceptability of medical abortion and manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) in the early first trimester pregnancy termination and factors affecting acceptability of medical and MVA abortion services.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted in two hospitals and two clinics from March 2009 to November 2009. The study population consisted of 414 subjects over the age of 18 with intrauterine pregnancies of up to 63 days' estimated gestation. Of these 251 subjects received mifepristone and misoprostol and 159 subjects received MVA. Questionnaires regarding expectations and experiences were administered before the abortion and at the 2-week follow-up visit.

Results: The study groups were similar with respect to age, marital status, educational status, religion and ethnicity. Their mean age was about 23, majority in both group completed secondary education and about half were married. Place of residence and duration of pregnancy were associated with method choice. Subjects undergoing medical abortions reported significantly greater satisfaction than those undergoing surgical abortions (91.2% vs 82.4%; P < .001). Of those women who had medical abortion, (83.3%) would choose the method again if needed, and (77.4%) of those who had MVA would also choose the method again. Ninety four percent of women who had medical abortion and 86.8% of those who had MVA would recommend the method to their friends.

Conclusions: Women receiving medical abortion were more satisfied with their method and more likely to choose the same method again than were subjects undergoing surgical abortion. We conclude that medical abortion can be used widely as an alternative method for early pregnancy termination.

Citing Articles

Validation of a novel medical device (Chloe SED®) for the administration of analgesia during manual vacuum aspiration: a randomized controlled non-inferiority pilot study.

Ramanathan A, Samenjo K, Bailey R, Imbamba J, Odenyo S, Koksal E Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024; 5:1326772.

PMID: 39411382 PMC: 11476421. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1326772.


Person-centered abortion care in public health facilities across four regions of Ethiopia: a cross-sectional quantitative study of client experiences.

Chekol B, McCaffrey S, Dijkerman S, Acre V, Biru D, Mehary A Front Reprod Health. 2024; 6:1331682.

PMID: 39296346 PMC: 11408316. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2024.1331682.


Methods women use for induced abortion and sources of services: insights from poor urban settlements of Accra, Ghana.

Agula C, Henry E, Asuming P, Agyei-Asabere C, Kushitor M, Canning D BMC Womens Health. 2021; 21(1):300.

PMID: 34399739 PMC: 8365972. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01444-9.


Factors affecting the persistent use of sharp curettage for abortion in public hospitals in Mexico.

Kung S, Ochoa B, Ortiz Avendano G, Lopez C, Zaragoza M, Padilla Zuniga K Womens Health (Lond). 2021; 17:17455065211029763.

PMID: 34263683 PMC: 8287640. DOI: 10.1177/17455065211029763.


Knowledge, Practice and Associated Factors Towards Medication Abortion Among Reproductive-Age Women in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2018: Cross-Sectional Study.

Wassie A, Lemlem S, Boka A Int J Womens Health. 2021; 13:489-499.

PMID: 34079386 PMC: 8163624. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S297626.


References
1.
Rorbye C, Norgaard M, Nilas L . Medical versus surgical abortion: comparing satisfaction and potential confounders in a partly randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2004; 20(3):834-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh643. View

2.
Singh S . Hospital admissions resulting from unsafe abortion: estimates from 13 developing countries. Lancet. 2006; 368(9550):1887-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69778-X. View

3.
Jensen J, Harvey S, Beckman L . Acceptability of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States: a prospective comparison study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182(6):1292-9. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.106183. View

4.
Loeber O . Motivation and satisfaction with early medical vs. surgical abortion in the Netherlands. Reprod Health Matters. 2010; 18(35):145-53. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(10)35501-7. View

5.
Honkanen H, Piaggio G, Hertzen H, Bartfai G, Erdenetungalag R, Gemzell-Danielsson K . WHO multinational study of three misoprostol regimens after mifepristone for early medical abortion. BJOG. 2004; 111(7):715-25. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00153.x. View