» Articles » PMID: 21637681

Genotype by Environment Interaction for 450-day Weight of Nelore Cattle Analyzed by Reaction Norm Models

Overview
Journal Genet Mol Biol
Specialty Genetics
Date 2011 Jun 4
PMID 21637681
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genotype by environment interactions (GEI) have attracted increasing attention in tropical breeding programs because of the variety of production systems involved. In this work, we assessed GEI in 450-day adjusted weight (W450) Nelore cattle from 366 Brazilian herds by comparing traditional univariate single-environment model analysis (UM) and random regression first order reaction norm models for six environmental variables: standard deviations of herd-year (RRMw) and herd-year-season-management (RRMw-m) groups for mean W450, standard deviations of herd-year (RRMg) and herd-year-season-management (RRMg-m) groups adjusted for 365-450 days weight gain (G450) averages, and two iterative algorithms using herd-year-season-management group solution estimates from a first RRMw-m and RRMg-m analysis (RRMITw-m and RRMITg-m, respectively). The RRM results showed similar tendencies in the variance components and heritability estimates along environmental gradient. Some of the variation among RRM estimates may have been related to the precision of the predictor and to correlations between environmental variables and the likely components of the weight trait. GEI, which was assessed by estimating the genetic correlation surfaces, had values < 0.5 between extreme environments in all models. Regression analyses showed that the correlation between the expected progeny differences for UM and the corresponding differences estimated by RRM was higher in intermediate and favorable environments than in unfavorable environments (p < 0.0001).

Citing Articles

Genotype-by-environment interactions for feed efficiency traits in Nellore cattle based on bi-trait reaction norm models.

Silva Neto J, Mota L, Amorim S, Peripolli E, Brito L, Magnabosco C Genet Sel Evol. 2023; 55(1):93.

PMID: 38097941 PMC: 10722809. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-023-00867-2.


Genotype by environment interaction for tick resistance of Hereford and Braford beef cattle using reaction norm models.

Mota R, Tempelman R, Lopes P, Aguilar I, Silva F, Cardoso F Genet Sel Evol. 2016; 48:3.

PMID: 26767704 PMC: 5518165. DOI: 10.1186/s12711-015-0178-5.


Genotype by environment interaction and breeding for robustness in livestock.

Rauw W, Gomez-Raya L Front Genet. 2015; 6:310.

PMID: 26539207 PMC: 4612141. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00310.


Multi-trait linear reaction norm model to describe the pattern of phenotypic expression of some economic traits in beef cattle across a range of environments.

Santana Jr M, Eler J, Bignardi A, Menendez-Buxadera A, Cardoso F, Ferraz J J Appl Genet. 2014; 56(2):219-29.

PMID: 25240721 DOI: 10.1007/s13353-014-0242-9.


Genotype by environment interaction in Nelore cattle from five Brazilian states.

Solar Diaz I, de Oliveira H, Bezerra L, Lobo R Genet Mol Biol. 2011; 34(3):435-42.

PMID: 21931516 PMC: 3168184. DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572011005000024.

References
1.
De Mattos D, Bertrand J, Misztal I . Investigation of genotype x environment interactions for weaning weight for Herefords in three countries. J Anim Sci. 2000; 78(8):2121-6. DOI: 10.2527/2000.7882121x. View

2.
Albuquerque L, Meyer K . Estimates of covariance functions for growth from birth to 630 days of age in Nelore cattle. J Anim Sci. 2002; 79(11):2776-89. DOI: 10.2527/2001.79112776x. View

3.
Mulder H, Bijma P . Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs. J Anim Sci. 2004; 83(1):49-61. DOI: 10.2527/2005.83149x. View

4.
Veerkamp R, Thompson R . A covariance function for feed intake, live weight, and milk yield estimated using a random regression model. J Dairy Sci. 1999; 82(7):1565-73. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75384-1. View

5.
Kirkpatrick M, Heckman N . A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters. J Math Biol. 1989; 27(4):429-50. DOI: 10.1007/BF00290638. View