» Articles » PMID: 21627475

The Golden Age of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery: Current and Future Perspectives

Overview
Journal Future Cardiol
Date 2011 Jun 2
PMID 21627475
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the past decade, minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery (MICS) has grown in popularity. This growth has been driven, in part, by a desire to translate many of the observed benefits of minimal access surgery, such as decreased pain and reduced surgical trauma, to the cardiac surgical arena. Initial enthusiasm for MICS was tempered by concerns over reduced surgical exposure in highly complex operations and the potential for prolonged operative times and patient safety. With innovations in perfusion techniques, refinement of transthoracic echocardiography and the development of specialized surgical instruments and robotic technology, cardiac surgery was provided with the necessary tools to progress to less invasive approaches. However, much of the early literature on MICS focused on technical reports or small case series. The safety and feasibility of MICS have been demonstrated, yet questions remain regarding the relative efficacy of MICS over traditional sternotomy approaches. Recently, there has been a growth in the body of published literature on MICS long-term outcomes, with most reports suggesting that major cardiac operations that have traditionally been performed through a median sternotomy can be performed through a variety of minimally invasive approaches with equivalent safety and durability. In this article, we examine the technological advancements that have made MICS possible and provide an update on the major areas of cardiac surgery where MICS has demonstrated the most growth, with consideration of current and future directions.

Citing Articles

Right anterior mini-thoracotomy as first-line strategy for isolated aortic valve replacement: a retrospective study.

Lim M, Lee C, Ju M, Je H J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(10):6664-6676.

PMID: 39552848 PMC: 11565346. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-928.


Beyond Conventional Operations: Embracing the Era of Contemporary Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.

Ilcheva L, Risteski P, Tudorache I, Haussler A, Papadopoulos N, Odavic D J Clin Med. 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068262 PMC: 10707549. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237210.


2023 APHRS expert consensus statements on surgery for AF.

Nitta T, Wai J, Lee S, Yii M, Chaiyaroj S, Ruaengsri C J Arrhythm. 2023; 39(6):841-852.

PMID: 38045465 PMC: 10692856. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12939.


Minimal invasive approaches for pediatric & congenital heart surgery: safe, reproducible, more cosmetic than through sternotomy, and here to stay.

Dodge-Khatami J, Dodge-Khatami A, Nguyen T, Ruffer A Transl Pediatr. 2023; 12(9):1744-1752.

PMID: 37814714 PMC: 10560358. DOI: 10.21037/tp-23-282.


Expanding the Minimally Invasive Approach towards the Ascending Aorta-A Practical Overview of the Currently Available Techniques.

Helms F, Schmack B, Weymann A, Hanke J, Natanov R, Martens A Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(9).

PMID: 37763737 PMC: 10534602. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59091618.


References
1.
Leon M, Smith C, Mack M, Miller D, Moses J, Svensson L . Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(17):1597-607. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232. View

2.
Puskas J, Cheng D, Knight J, Angelini G, Decannier D, Diegeler A . Off-Pump versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis and Consensus Statement From The 2004 ISMICS Consensus Conference. Innovations (Phila). 2012; 1(1):3-27. DOI: 10.1097/01243895-200512000-00002. View

3.
Wong M, Clark D, Horrigan M, Grube E, Matalanis G, Farouque H . Advances in percutaneous treatment for adult valvular heart disease. Intern Med J. 2009; 39(7):465-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01877.x. View

4.
Stover E, Siegel L, Parks R, Levin J, Body S, Maddi R . Variability in transfusion practice for coronary artery bypass surgery persists despite national consensus guidelines: a 24-institution study. Institutions of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. Anesthesiology. 1998; 88(2):327-33. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199802000-00009. View

5.
Byrne J, Leacche M, Vaughan D, Zhao D . Hybrid cardiovascular procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 1(5):459-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.07.002. View