» Articles » PMID: 21624924

How to Make Predictions About Future Infectious Disease Risks

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2011 Jun 1
PMID 21624924
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Formal, quantitative approaches are now widely used to make predictions about the likelihood of an infectious disease outbreak, how the disease will spread, and how to control it. Several well-established methodologies are available, including risk factor analysis, risk modelling and dynamic modelling. Even so, predictive modelling is very much the 'art of the possible', which tends to drive research effort towards some areas and away from others which may be at least as important. Building on the undoubted success of quantitative modelling of the epidemiology and control of human and animal diseases such as AIDS, influenza, foot-and-mouth disease and BSE, attention needs to be paid to developing a more holistic framework that captures the role of the underlying drivers of disease risks, from demography and behaviour to land use and climate change. At the same time, there is still considerable room for improvement in how quantitative analyses and their outputs are communicated to policy makers and other stakeholders. A starting point would be generally accepted guidelines for 'good practice' for the development and the use of predictive models.

Citing Articles

Incorporating Social Determinants of Health in Infectious Disease Models: A Systematic Review of Guidelines.

Ali S, Li Z, Moqueet N, Moghadas S, Galvani A, Cooper L Med Decis Making. 2024; 44(7):742-755.

PMID: 39305116 PMC: 11491037. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241280611.


Understanding underlying physical mechanism reveals early warning indicators and key elements for adaptive infections disease networks.

Wang L, Zhang K, Xu L, Wang J PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(7):pgae237.

PMID: 39035039 PMC: 11259140. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae237.


Using real-time modelling to inform the 2017 Ebola outbreak response in DR Congo.

Thompson R, Hart W, Keita M, Fall I, Gueye A, Chamla D Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5667.

PMID: 38971835 PMC: 11227569. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49888-5.


A rapid review of best practices in the development of risk registers for public health emergency management.

Kostirko D, Zhao J, Lavigne M, Hermant B, Totten L Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1200438.

PMID: 38098833 PMC: 10720617. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1200438.


A Comparative Study on Deep Learning Models for COVID-19 Forecast.

Guo Z, Lin Q, Meng X Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(17).

PMID: 37685434 PMC: 10486679. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11172400.


References
1.
Tildesley M, House T, Bruhn M, Curry R, ONeil M, Allpress J . Impact of spatial clustering on disease transmission and optimal control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 107(3):1041-6. PMC: 2824282. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909047107. View

2.
Woolhouse M . Epidemiology: emerging diseases go global. Nature. 2008; 451(7181):898-9. PMC: 7095335. DOI: 10.1038/451898a. View

3.
Bessell P, Shaw D, Savill N, Woolhouse M . Statistical modeling of holding level susceptibility to infection during the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain. Int J Infect Dis. 2009; 14(3):e210-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.05.003. View

4.
Taylor N, Honhold N, Paterson A, Mansley L . Risk of foot-and-mouth disease associated with proximity in space and time to infected premises and the implications for control policy during the 2001 epidemic in Cumbria. Vet Rec. 2004; 154(20):617-26. DOI: 10.1136/vr.154.20.617. View

5.
Rogers D, Randolph S, Snow R, Hay S . Satellite imagery in the study and forecast of malaria. Nature. 2002; 415(6872):710-5. PMC: 3160466. DOI: 10.1038/415710a. View