» Articles » PMID: 21605518

Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis Treatment

Overview
Journal JSLS
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2011 May 25
PMID 21605518
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: To report our experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) in patients undergoing hemodialysis compared with normal counterparts.

Methods: Seventeen patients (20 renal units, Group 1) undergoing hemodialysis underwent LN, which was indicated due to nonfunctioning kidney in 17 and suspected malignancy in 3 renal units. Radical nephrectomy (RN), simple nephrectomy (SN), and simple nephroureterectomy (SNU) were performed in 3, 9, and 8 cases, respectively. For comparison, 101 patients (Group 2) without CRF (chronic renal failure) who had undergone LN were evaluated. In this group, RN, SN, SNU and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) were performed in 48, 41, 8, and 4 patients, respectively.

Results: The mean age (36.9 ±13.1 vs. 48.7±19.4yr, P=0.002) and BMI (22.1±4.8 vs. 26.2±5.1kg/m(2), P=0.001) were lower in Group 1, whereas ASA (physical status score of American Society of Anesthesiologists) score (2.8±0.4 vs. 1.5±0.7, P<0.001) was lower in Group 2. The estimated blood loss (111±114 vs. 184±335mL, P=0.34) was higher in Group 2. Both groups were comparable in regard to mean operative time (133±79 vs. 119±45, P±0.70), hematocrit drop (4.69±3.9 vs. 3.86±3.0, P=0.29) and hospital stay (3.6±3.3 vs. 3.3±2.4 days, P=0.34). Meanwhile, when only patients undergoing SN and SNU in the study cohort (n=17 in Group 1 and n=49 in Group 2) are taken into consideration, no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in terms of any kind of above-mentioned perioperative parameters. No case in Group 1 was converted to open surgery due to metabolic problems.

Conclusions: LN in patients undergoing hemodialysis may be performed safely by an experienced laparoscopy team.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal simple nephrectomy: The impact of etiological factors of the results of surgical treatment.

Naghiyev R, Imamverdiyev S, Efendiyev E, Sanli O Turk J Urol. 2017; 43(3):319-324.

PMID: 28861305 PMC: 5562252. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.21855.

References
1.
Keeley F, Tolley D . A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy: defining risk factors for complications. Br J Urol. 1998; 82(5):615-8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00847.x. View

2.
Goel R, Modi P, Dodia S . Retroperitoneoscopic pre-transplant native kidney nephrectomy. Int J Urol. 2006; 13(4):337-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01311.x. View

3.
Pace K, Dyer S, Stewart R, Honey R, Poulin E, Schlachta C . Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2002; 17(1):143-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8902-y. View

4.
Dunn M, Portis A, Shalhav A, Elbahnasy A, Heidorn C, McDougall E . Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol. 2000; 164(4):1153-9. View

5.
Ekman L, Abrahamsson J, Biber B, FORSSMAN L, Milsom I, Sjoqvist B . Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopy with positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1988; 32(6):447-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1988.tb02764.x. View