» Articles » PMID: 21603644

Estimating Survival in Patients with Operable Skeletal Metastases: an Application of a Bayesian Belief Network

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 May 24
PMID 21603644
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurate estimations of life expectancy are important in the management of patients with metastatic cancer affecting the extremities, and help set patient, family, and physician expectations. Clinically, the decision whether to operate on patients with skeletal metastases, as well as the choice of surgical procedure, are predicated on an individual patient's estimated survival. Currently, there are no reliable methods for estimating survival in this patient population. Bayesian classification, which includes bayesian belief network (BBN) modeling, is a statistical method that explores conditional, probabilistic relationships between variables to estimate the likelihood of an outcome using observed data. Thus, BBN models are being used with increasing frequency in a variety of diagnoses to codify complex clinical data into prognostic models. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of developing bayesian classifiers to estimate survival in patients undergoing surgery for metastases of the axial and appendicular skeleton.

Methods: We searched an institution-owned patient management database for all patients who underwent surgery for skeletal metastases between 1999 and 2003. We then developed and trained a machine-learned BBN model to estimate survival in months using candidate features based on historical data. Ten-fold cross-validation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to evaluate the BNN model's accuracy and robustness.

Results: A total of 189 consecutive patients were included. First-degree predictors of survival differed between the 3-month and 12-month models. Following cross validation, the area under the ROC curve was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.93) for 3-month probability of survival and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.90) for 12-month probability of survival.

Conclusions: A robust, accurate, probabilistic naïve BBN model was successfully developed using observed clinical data to estimate individualized survival in patients with operable skeletal metastases. This method warrants further development and must be externally validated in other patient populations.

Citing Articles

Artificial Intelligence and the State of the Art of Orthopedic Surgery.

Khojastehnezhad M, Youseflee P, Moradi A, Ebrahimzadeh M, Jirofti N Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025; 13(1):17-22.

PMID: 39886341 PMC: 11776378. DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.84231.3829.


Systematic review of 99 extremity bone malignancy survival prediction models.

Lai C, Yen H, Lin H, Groot O, Lin W, Hsu H J Orthop Traumatol. 2025; 26(1):5.

PMID: 39873938 PMC: 11775353. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-025-00821-6.


Palliative care of proximal femur metastatic disease and osteolytic lesions: results following surgical and radiation treatment.

Mehnert E, Moller F, Hofbauer C, Weidlich A, Winkler D, Troost E BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1431.

PMID: 39574021 PMC: 11580346. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-13170-0.


What Factors Are Associated With Implant Revision in the Treatment of Pathologic Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures?.

Leland C, Gonzalez M, Werenski J, Vallone A, Brighton K, Newman E Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024; 483(3):473-484.

PMID: 39437551 PMC: 11828034. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003291.


Risk Factors for Early Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality following Extremity Metastatic Pathologic or Impending Fracture Fixation.

Wang P, Charron B, Hali K, Raleigh M, Balso C, Macleod M Int J Surg Oncol. 2024; 2024:3565134.

PMID: 39301148 PMC: 11412750. DOI: 10.1155/2024/3565134.


References
1.
Saad F, Lipton A, Cook R, Chen Y, Smith M, Coleman R . Pathologic fractures correlate with reduced survival in patients with malignant bone disease. Cancer. 2007; 110(8):1860-7. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22991. View

2.
Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D, Horton J, Davis T, McFadden E . Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982; 5(6):649-55. View

3.
Lisboa P, Taktak A . The use of artificial neural networks in decision support in cancer: a systematic review. Neural Netw. 2006; 19(4):408-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2005.10.007. View

4.
Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Wakai K, Sugiura H, Kataoka T, Nakanishi K . Prognostic factors and a scoring system for patients with skeletal metastasis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(5):698-703. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15185. View

5.
LEVITT S, Aeppli D, Nierengarten M . The importance of local control in the conservative treatment of breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 1995; 34(6):839-44. DOI: 10.3109/02841869509127194. View