» Articles » PMID: 21603388

Utility of the 6-minute Walk Test Following Lung Transplantation

Overview
Journal Ochsner J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 May 24
PMID 21603388
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) has replaced standard cardiopulmonary exercises for the evaluation of lung disease. However, data on the utility and characteristics of the 6-MWT following lung transplant are lacking. This study aimed to determine if 6-MWT distance has a normal distribution at 6 months post-transplant and if lower 6-MWT distance was predictive of all-cause mortality.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 6-MWT data on all patients who were lung transplant recipients at Ochsner Medical Center between 2000 and 2005. Forty-nine lung transplant recipients completed a 6-MWT at 6 months following transplant. Of these 49 patients, 34 had completed both the 6-month and 12-month 6-MWT, and data from these were used to evaluate change in distance walked over time.

Results: The mean age was 46 ± 16 years, 57% were female, and 69% received a bilateral lung transplant. Normal distribution by Kolmogorov-Smirnov was demonstrated for 6-MWT distance at 6 months (P  =  0.873). Mean distance walked improved from 348 ± 15 m to 478 ±14 m at 12 months (P  =  0.0001). The 6-MWT distance at 6 months was not a predictor of survival (OR  =  1.002).

Conclusions: Distance for the 6-MWT followed a normal distribution following lung transplant, and distances walked continued to improve for a year following transplant. Although 6-MWT distances are not a predictor of survival, other components of the test may strengthen the predictive value for morbidity and mortality post-transplant.

Citing Articles

Health-related Quality of Life and Exercise Capacity in Double Lung Transplant Recipients With Baseline Lung Allograft Dysfunction.

Rullay A, Kaur K, Holman J, van den Bosch L, Weinkauf J, Nagendran J Transplant Direct. 2025; 11(2):e1751.

PMID: 39802201 PMC: 11723686. DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001751.


Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Performed Through Exercise Training for Patients with Stable COPD: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Zerbo Sporin D, Domjanic D, Zvanut B Zdr Varst. 2022; 61(4):231-241.

PMID: 36348964 PMC: 9597899. DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2022-0031.


Relationship of Exercise Capacity, Physical Function, and Frailty Measures With Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization in Lung Transplantation: A Scoping Review.

Bourgeois N, Shallwani S, Al-Huda F, Mathur S, Poirier C, Janaudis-Ferreira T Transplant Direct. 2022; 8(11):e1385.

PMID: 36246000 PMC: 9553387. DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001385.


Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in lung transplantation: a review.

Dudley K, El-Chemaly S Pulm Med. 2012; 2012:237852.

PMID: 22666582 PMC: 3361366. DOI: 10.1155/2012/237852.


Letters to the editor.

Ochsner J. 2011; 11(1):4.

PMID: 21603325 PMC: 3096177.

References
1.
Sciurba F, Criner G, Lee S, Mohsenifar Z, Shade D, Slivka W . Six-minute walk distance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: reproducibility and effect of walking course layout and length. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003; 167(11):1522-7. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200203-166OC. View

2.
Kadikar A, Maurer J, Kesten S . The six-minute walk test: a guide to assessment for lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997; 16(3):313-9. View

3.
Solway S, Brooks D, Lacasse Y, Thomas S . A qualitative systematic overview of the measurement properties of functional walk tests used in the cardiorespiratory domain. Chest. 2001; 119(1):256-70. DOI: 10.1378/chest.119.1.256. View

4.
. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 166(1):111-7. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. View

5.
Lederer D, Arcasoy S, Wilt J, DOvidio F, Sonett J, Kawut S . Six-minute-walk distance predicts waiting list survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 174(6):659-64. PMC: 2648057. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200604-520OC. View