» Articles » PMID: 21603283

Standards for Scalable Clinical Decision Support: Need, Current and Emerging Standards, Gaps, and Proposal for Progress

Overview
Publisher Bentham Open
Date 2011 May 24
PMID 21603283
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite their potential to significantly improve health care, advanced clinical decision support (CDS) capabilities are not widely available in the clinical setting. An important reason for this limited availability of CDS capabilities is the application-specific and institution-specific nature of most current CDS implementations. Thus, a critical need for enabling CDS capabilities on a much larger scale is the development and adoption of standards that enable current and emerging CDS resources to be more effectively leveraged across multiple applications and care settings. Standards required for such effective scaling of CDS include (i) standard terminologies and information models to represent and communicate about health care data; (ii) standard approaches to representing clinical knowledge in both human-readable and machine-executable formats; and (iii) standard approaches for leveraging these knowledge resources to provide CDS capabilities across various applications and care settings. A number of standards do exist or are under development to meet these needs. However, many gaps and challenges remain, including the excessive complexity of many standards; the limited availability of easily accessible knowledge resources implemented using standard approaches; and the lack of tooling and other practical resources to enable the efficient adoption of existing standards. Thus, the future development and widespread adoption of current CDS standards will depend critically on the availability of tooling, knowledge bases, and other resources that make the adoption of CDS standards not only the right approach to take, but the cost-effective path to follow given the alternative of using a traditional, ad hoc approach to implementing CDS.

Citing Articles

Barriers and enablers to implementing and using clinical decision support systems for chronic diseases: a qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.

Chen W, OBryan C, Gorham G, Howard K, Balasubramanya B, Coffey P Implement Sci Commun. 2022; 3(1):81.

PMID: 35902894 PMC: 9330991. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00326-x.


Design, effectiveness, and economic outcomes of contemporary chronic disease clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen W, Howard K, Gorham G, OBryan C, Coffey P, Balasubramanya B J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022; 29(10):1757-1772.

PMID: 35818299 PMC: 9471723. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac110.


Implementation of pharmacogenomic clinical decision support for health systems: a cost-utility analysis.

Jiang S, Mathias P, Hendrix N, Shirts B, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Veenstra D Pharmacogenomics J. 2022; 22(3):188-197.

PMID: 35365779 PMC: 9156556. DOI: 10.1038/s41397-022-00275-7.


Coordinated use of Health Level 7 standards to support clinical decision support: Case study with shared decision making and drug-drug interactions.

Thiess H, Del Fiol G, Malone D, Cornia R, Sibilla M, Rhodes B Int J Med Inform. 2022; 162:104749.

PMID: 35358893 PMC: 9703934. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104749.


Considerations for Designing EHR-Embedded Clinical Decision Support Systems for Antimicrobial Stewardship in Pediatric Emergency Departments.

Ozkaynak M, Metcalf N, Cohen D, May L, Dayan P, Mistry R Appl Clin Inform. 2020; 11(4):589-597.

PMID: 32906153 PMC: 7557324. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715893.


References
1.
Kaiser K, Akkaya C, Miksch S . How can information extraction ease formalizing treatment processes in clinical practice guidelines? A method and its evaluation. Artif Intell Med. 2006; 39(2):151-63. PMC: 2858817. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.07.011. View

2.
Bodenreider O . Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support. Yearb Med Inform. 2008; :67-79. PMC: 2592252. View

3.
Sordo M, Boxwala A, Ogunyemi O, Greenes R . Description and status update on GELLO: a proposed standardized object-oriented expression language for clinical decision support. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 1):164-8. View

4.
Osheroff J, Teich J, Middleton B, Steen E, Wright A, Detmer D . A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007; 14(2):141-5. PMC: 2213467. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2334. View

5.
Schadow G . Assessing the impact of HL7/FDA Structured Product Label (SPL) content for medication knowledge management. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008; :646-50. PMC: 2655908. View