» Articles » PMID: 21601861

Sex-specific Differences in Gait Patterns of Healthy Older Adults: Results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2011 May 24
PMID 21601861
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effects of normal aging and orthopedic conditions on gait patterns during customary walking have been extensively investigated. Empirical evidence supports the notion that sex differences exist in the gait patterns of young adults but it is unclear as to whether sex differences exist in older adults. The aim of this study was to investigate sex-specific differences in gait among older adults. Study participants were 336 adults (50-96 years; 162 women) enrolled in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) who completed walking tasks at self-selected speed without assistance. After adjusting for significant covariates, women walked with higher cadence (p=0.01) and shorter stride length (p=0.006) compared to men, while gait speed was not significantly related to sex. Women also had less hip range of motion (ROM; p=0.004) and greater ankle ROM (p<0.001) in the sagittal-plane, and greater hip ROM (p=0.004) in the frontal-plane. Hip absorptive mechanical work expenditure (MWE) of the women was greater in the sagittal-plane (p<0.001) and lower in the frontal-plane (p<0.001), compared to men. In summary, women's gait is characterized by greater ankle ROM than men while men tend to have greater hip ROM than women. Characterizing unique gait patterns of women and men with aging may be beneficial for detecting the early stages of gait abnormalities that may lead to pathology.

Citing Articles

Gender Differences in Joint Biomechanics During Obstacle Crossing with Different Heights.

Wang C, Guo Y, Du W, Li Z, Chen W Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001708 PMC: 11851498. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020189.


Influence of age and gender on gait kinematics of pelvis and hip in healthy adults aged 19-60 years.

Mullerpatan R, Shetty T, Agarwal B Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12:1515583.

PMID: 39867475 PMC: 11757870. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1515583.


Impact of Overweight on Spatial-Temporal Gait Parameters During Obstacle Crossing in Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Chardon M, Barbieri F, Hansen C, Petit P, Vuillerme N Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39686405 PMC: 11644976. DOI: 10.3390/s24237867.


Noradrenergic cardiac denervation is associated with gait velocity in Parkinson disease: a dual ligand PET study.

Carli G, Kanel P, Roytman S, Pongmala C, Albin R, Raffel D Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(13):3978-3989.

PMID: 38958681 PMC: 11897926. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06822-7.


In-vivo 3-dimensional spine and lower body gait symmetry analysis in healthy individuals.

Arauz P, Garcia M, Chiriboga P, Okushiro V, Vinueza B, Fierro K Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e28345.

PMID: 38689989 PMC: 11059545. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28345.


References
1.
Tolea M, Costa P, Terracciano A, Griswold M, Simonsick E, Najjar S . Sex-specific correlates of walking speed in a wide age-ranged population. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010; 65B(2):174-84. PMC: 2821942. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbp130. View

2.
Kerrigan D, Todd M, Croce U . Gender differences in joint biomechanics during walking: normative study in young adults. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998; 77(1):2-7. DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199801000-00002. View

3.
Wearing S, Urry S, Smeathers J . The effect of visual targeting on ground reaction force and temporospatial parameters of gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2000; 15(8):583-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00025-5. View

4.
Chumanov E, Wall-Scheffler C, Heiderscheit B . Gender differences in walking and running on level and inclined surfaces. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008; 23(10):1260-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.07.011. View

5.
DeVita P, Hortobagyi T . Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000; 88(5):1804-11. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.5.1804. View