» Articles » PMID: 21600606

Optimal Freeze Cycle Length for Renal Cryotherapy

Abstract

Purpose: To our knowledge the optimal freeze cycle length in renal cryotherapy is unknown. Ten-minute time based freeze cycles were compared to temperature based freeze cycles to -20C.

Materials And Methods: Laparoscopic renal cryotherapy was performed on 16 swine. Time based trials consisted of a double 10-minute freeze separated by a 5-minute thaw. Temperature based trials were double cycles of 1, 5 or 10-minute freeze initiated after 1 of 4 sensors indicated -20C. A 5-minute active thaw was used between freeze cycles. Control trials consisted of cryoneedle placement for 25 minutes without freeze or thaw. Viability staining and histological analysis were done.

Results: There was no difference in cellular necrosis between any of the temperature based freeze cycles (p = 0.1). Time based freeze cycles showed more nuclear pyknosis, indicative of necrosis, than the 3 experimental freeze cycles for the renal cortex (p = 0.05) but not for the renal medulla (p = 0.61). Mean time to -20C for freeze cycle 1 was 19 minutes 10 seconds (range 9 to 46 minutes). In 4 of 21 trials (19%) -20C was never attained despite freezing for 25 to 63 minutes.

Conclusions: There was no difference in immediate cellular necrosis among double 1, 5 or 10-minute freeze cycles. Cellular necrosis was evident on histological analysis for trials in which -20C was attained and in freeze cycles based on time alone. With a standard 10-minute cryoablation period most treated parenchyma 1 cm from the probe never attained -20C. Cell death appeared to occur at temperatures warmer than -20C during renal cryotherapy.

Citing Articles

Image-guided percutaneous ablative treatments for renal cell carcinoma.

Auer T, Uluk Y, Grasso R, Kloeckner R, Gebauer B, Kroencke T Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40050457 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11480-w.


Multipoint Thermal Sensors Associated with Improved Oncologic Outcomes Following Cryoablation.

Martin J, Patel R, Okhunov Z, Vyas A, Vajgrt D, Clayman R J Endourol. 2017; 31(4):355-360.

PMID: 28114787 PMC: 5397231. DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0864.

References
1.
Frank I, Blute M, Leibovich B, Cheville J, Lohse C, Zincke H . Independent validation of the 2002 American Joint Committee on cancer primary tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma using a large, single institution cohort. J Urol. 2005; 173(6):1889-92. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158043.94525.d6. View

2.
Stephenson R, King D, Rohr L . Renal cryoablation in a canine model. Urology. 1996; 47(5):772-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00028-3. View

3.
Schmidlin F, Rupp C, Hoffmann N, Coad J, Swanlund D, Hulbert J . Measurement and prediction of thermal behavior and acute assessment of injury in a pig model of renal cryosurgery. J Endourol. 2001; 15(2):193-7. DOI: 10.1089/089277901750134584. View

4.
Chosy S, Nakada S, Lee Jr F, Warner T . Monitoring renal cryosurgery: predictors of tissue necrosis in swine. J Urol. 1998; 159(4):1370-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63618-8. View

5.
Oda T, MIYAO N, Takahashi A, Yanase M, Masumori N, Itoh N . Growth rates of primary and metastatic lesions of renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol. 2001; 8(9):473-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00353.x. View