» Articles » PMID: 21599528

Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Medium-term Follow-up

Overview
Journal J Endourol
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Date 2011 May 24
PMID 21599528
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRFs), defined as asymptomatic, noninfectious, ≤4  mm fragments, are sometimes observed after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Because the natural history of these fragments is unclear, we investigated the medium-term outcome of these fragments.

Patients And Methods: During a 3-year period, 430 patients underwent PCNL. Overall stone-free rate was 74.5%, and CIRFs were encountered in 22% of cases 3 months after surgery. A total of 38 patients who had CIRFs immediately after PCNL with at least 24 months of follow-up were included in the study. All patients were subjected to periodic follow-up with detailed history, clinical examination, and radiographic follow-up. Serum biochemistry together with urine metabolic evaluation was also performed.

Results: The median follow-up was 28.4±5.3 months (range 24-38  mos). Ten (26.3%) patients had a symptomatic episode that necessitated medical therapy during follow-up while others remained asymptomatic. Radiologic assessment showed an increase in the size of the fragments in 8 (21.1%) patients, while the size of the fragments was stable or decreased in 27 (71.1%) cases. Three (7.9%) patients had spontaneous stone passage. Metabolic evaluation revealed abnormalities in 10 (26.3%) patients. Stone analysis revealed magnesium ammonium phosphate in three of eight patients who had an increase in residual fragment size. Also, only two of these eight patients had a metabolic abnormality (one hypocitraturia and one hypercalciuria).

Conclusion: Medium-term follow-up of CIRFs after PCNL revealed that progression within 2 years is relatively common. Increase in fragment size is common in patients with struvite stones, and presence of risk factors on 24-hour urine metabolic analysis does not seem to predict growth of observed fragments.

Citing Articles

What is the definition of stone dust and how does it compare with clinically insignificant residual fragments? A comprehensive review.

Panthier F, Kwok J, Tzou D, Monga M, Traxer O, Keller E World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):292.

PMID: 38704492 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04993-4.


Follow-up of urolithiasis patients after treatment: an algorithm from the EAU Urolithiasis Panel.

Lombardo R, Tzelves L, Geraghty R, Davis N, Neisius A, Petrik A World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):202.

PMID: 38546854 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04872-y.


The significance of clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis into the relevance of complete stone clearance.

Kingma R, Doppen C, Bus M, Altobelli E, de Jong I, Roemeling S World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):78.

PMID: 38353780 PMC: 10866741. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04774-z.


Is traditional stone clinic the optimal use of NHS resources?.

Corkill J, Sale A, Gallegos C, Jefferies E Urolithiasis. 2024; 52(1):29.

PMID: 38300331 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-023-01523-6.


Nomogram to predict the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with residual stones following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Xie F, Deng S, Fei K, Xu H, Zhang H Int Braz J Urol. 2023; 49(5):599-607.

PMID: 37390125 PMC: 10482460. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0111.